exercism / exercism/problem-specifications

pythagorean-triplet: new tests require non-trivial solution

Aperta
#1,347 7 commenti 0 reazioni 0 assegnatari Vedi su GitHub
Lingua principale
Ruby
Stelle
358
Fork
563
Merge medio
18h 41m
PR unite (30g)
2

Descrizione

I recently rewrote the Python version of this exercise based on [canonical data 1.0.0](https://github.com/exercism/problem-specifications/blob/master/exercises/pythagorean-triplet/canonical-data.json).

I wanted to update that the trivial solution for finding triplets in a range by brute force takes a very long time on the latest tests (for example [this](https://github.com/ThomasZumsteg/exercism-python/blob/master/pythagorean-triplet/pythagorean_triplet.py)). Almost all solutions I saw used this method and will not finish in reasonable time (if at all). I think it would be difficult for people to find an efficient solution by themselves. Perhaps a hint should be given?

The previous `example.py` would not handle these tests as well. The new [`example.py` ](https://github.com/exercism/python/blob/master/exercises/pythagorean-triplet/example.py) solves the tests quickly. It generates triplets in range efficiently by building triplets from multiples of primitive triplets.

Overall I think the new tests make the exercise more interesting. However, I think it would be difficult for people to come up with an efficient enough solution to pass them in reasonable time. I would be happy to hear what others think.

(related to #1211 )

Guida per i contributori

Nessuna guida per i contributori indicizzata per questo repository

Valutazione

Questa issue non è ancora stata valutata.

Ricevi le nuove issue nella tua casella

Un breve riepilogo di issue GitHub adatte ai principianti.