Add standard "known vulnerabilities" metadata field, sourced from OSV
Nadie ha tomado este issue todavía.
Evaluación
- Dificultad
- 5/5
- Tiempo estimado
- Más de una semana
- Aptitud para principiantes
- 45/100
Línea de trabajo
Start with PythonRepositoryVersionViewSet and the existing VulnerabilityReport.vulns data, then compare the response-shape precedent in #1282 for PackageYank. The work is done when Simple API and JSON API responses expose the standard vulnerabilities field from OSV results, with the issue's open question about automatic scanning resolved.
Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.
Descripción
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
pulp_python already has vulnerability-scanning capability: a scan action on PythonRepositoryVersionViewSet (added in #1013/#1012) queries OSV.dev and stores results in pulpcore's VulnerabilityReport model. However, that data is not exposed through the standard PyPI "known vulnerabilities" metadata field described in the PyPI JSON API spec — the existing scan output lives in its own report resource, not in the Simple API / JSON API response shape that standard PyPI tooling expects, and today's scan is manual/on-demand only. Tooling that relies on the standard field for vulnerability visibility (e.g. Red Hat Trusted Libraries / the pulp-trustify effort) has no way to consume it from pulp_python today.
Describe the solution you'd like
Surface the existing VulnerabilityReport.vulns data (see above) through the Simple API / JSON API responses as the standard vulnerabilities field, following a comparable per-(name, version) marker pattern to native PackageYank support (#1282) for the API-shape/serializer side. OSV remains the data source underneath — no new scanning backend needed. Open design question to resolve here: scanning today is manual/on-demand only — deciding whether it should also trigger automatically (e.g. on sync/upload) is in scope for this issue.
This is agreed phase-1 scope for the Pulp-Trustify integration effort — complex/custom scanning and Trustify-specific data-source integration are intentionally deferred to a later phase (see context below).
Describe alternatives you've considered
- Implementing this in
pulp-serviceinstead — ruled out;pulp-service(the hosted Pulp team) is an external stakeholder for this effort, not a place for this logic to live. - Full Trustify-backed scanning/library integration now — deferred; this issue is scoped narrowly to the standard OSV-sourced
vulnerabilitiesfield, decoupled from the broaderpulp-trustifycore-library work happening in parallel in pulp/pulp_trustify. - Building a new scanning mechanism from scratch — ruled out; #1013/#1012 already added an OSV.dev-backed scan pipeline (
VulnerabilityReportmodel,scanaction) that this issue should extend rather than duplicate.
Additional context
- Part of the broader Trustify integration program (Red Hat Trusted Libraries / Calunga); tracked upstream at pulp/pulp_trustify.
- Related PRs: #1013/#1012 (existing OSV.dev-backed scan pipeline —
VulnerabilityReportmodel,scanaction — the mechanism this issue extends), #1282 (nativePackageYankcontent model — API-shape precedent for surfacing a per-package marker). - Filed on behalf of Otávio Fernandes; Gerrod Ubben to be notified separately once this is actually filed — he may pick it up next sprint, or review a contribution from Otávio.
- Lenguaje dominante
- Python
- Estrellas
- 49
- Forks
- 88
- Merge medio
- 1 d 10 h
- PR fusionados (30 d)
- 31
Guía de contribución
Primeros pasos
- Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
- Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
- Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
- Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.
Más de pulp/pulp_python
-
Dificultad 3/5 1-2 días Aptitud para principiantes 68/100
pulp/pulp_python#1381 ·
-
Feature Triage-Needed
Dificultad 5/5 Más de una semana Aptitud para principiantes 45/100
pulp/pulp_python#1371 ·
-
Dificultad 4/5 3-5 días Aptitud para principiantes 52/100
pulp/pulp_python#1358 ·
-
Feature
pulp/pulp_python#1340 · 1 asignado ·
-
Issue
Dificultad 3/5 1-2 días Aptitud para principiantes 58/100
pulp/pulp_python#1219 · 1 comentario ·
Todos los issues de pulp/pulp_python
Issues similares
-
bug
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 86/100
zostera/django-bootstrap4#894 ·
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 78/100
use-agent-os/agent-os#3276 ·
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 88/100
zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr#119726 ·
-
area/auth bug comp/agent P3 platform/discord type/security
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 88/100
NousResearch/hermes-agent#117848 ·
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 82/100
zilliztech/memsearch#759 ·