Rate-limit expensive RPCs to prevent resource exhaustion
Nadie ha tomado este issue todavía.
Evaluación
- Dificultad
- 5/5
- Tiempo estimado
- Más de una semana
- Aptitud para principiantes
- 35/100
- Tipo de issue
- Nueva funcionalidad
- Claridad
- Necesita aclaración
- Estado de actividad
- Activo
- Stack tecnológico
- rust
- Área
- api, backend-api-design, security
Línea de trabajo
Start by tracing the named RPC entry points: KMS key issuance/SignCert, Gateway RegisterCvm, and Verify. Define how anonymous, authenticated, shared-resource, and replica-spread requests should be limited, then validate floods and expensive invalid requests against early rejection, service preservation, retry guidance, bounded state, and exposed counters.
Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.
Descripción
Problem
Repeated calls to expensive RPCs—such as KMS key issuance / SignCert, Gateway RegisterCvm, and Verify—can exhaust CPU, disk, subprocess, or external-service resources and degrade service for other users.
Abuse can come from unauthenticated callers, invalid requests that are expensive to reject, or authenticated clients making otherwise valid requests. Authentication and concurrency limits alone do not bound sustained resource consumption.
Proposed direction
Introduce low-overhead, server-side rate limiting for expensive RPC paths:
- Configurable token buckets with sustained-rate and burst limits.
- A coarse limit before expensive authentication, attestation verification, or request processing.
- Additional per-client limits using verified instance/app identity where available. For anonymous callers, define an appropriate source-based policy; never trust arbitrary identity headers.
- Shared service/resource budgets to contain aggregate load, including requests spread across identities or endpoints.
- Reject excess requests early with a distinguishable rate-limit error and retry guidance.
- Bound limiter state and cleanup cost. Start process-local and document how limits behave across replicas.
Limits should accommodate normal boot, registration refresh, and certificate renewal bursts.
Validation
Test floods from anonymous callers, expensive invalid requests, and authenticated clients. Verify that limits bound accepted request rates, reject excess work early, and preserve service for unrelated clients. Expose rate-limit counters for tuning.
Related: #1258, #1259. Separate from concurrency/admission control in #1096.
- Lenguaje dominante
- Rust
- Estrellas
- 546
- Forks
- 96
- Merge medio
- 19 h 22 min
- PR fusionados (30 d)
- 109
Guía de contribución
Primeros pasos
- Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
- Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
- Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
- Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.
Más de Dstack-TEE/dstack
-
Dificultad 5/5 Más de una semana Aptitud para principiantes 30/100
Dstack-TEE/dstack#1301 ·
-
Dificultad 3/5 1-2 días Aptitud para principiantes 55/100
Dstack-TEE/dstack#1300 ·
-
Dificultad 4/5 3-5 días Aptitud para principiantes 48/100
Dstack-TEE/dstack#1299 ·
-
Dificultad 4/5 3-5 días Aptitud para principiantes 48/100
Dstack-TEE/dstack#1298 ·
-
Dificultad 5/5 Más de una semana Aptitud para principiantes 25/100
Dstack-TEE/dstack#1297 ·
Todos los issues de Dstack-TEE/dstack
Issues similares
-
risk:low runtime status:in-progress type:test
Dificultad 1/5 Menos de una hora Aptitud para principiantes 92/100
zeroclaw-labs/zeroclaw#11023 ·
-
good first issue refactor
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 72/100
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 86/100
kwakseongjae/auto-hwp#319 ·
-
area:cli bug filter-quality good first issue priority:medium
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 84/100
-
Dificultad 1/5 Menos de una hora Aptitud para principiantes 72/100
bevyengine/bevy#25861 ·