I think the wording of the petition is holding this back

### https://www.serverless-ruby.org/

> "We **demand** FaaS for Ruby !"

As someone who has programmed in Ruby for over a decade, still deploys Ruby applications, and currently also deploys serverless applications (in Node.js), I'm hesitant to sign this petition, because it sounds whiny.

Why do we have to make "demands?" Is this a political statement? Are we suggesting that those that sign it cannot deploy a serverless function in any other language? For example, a perfect counter argument to this petition might be, _"If those behind the petition are willing to sound so self-righteous, then maybe they should build a FaaS competitor themselves (good luck with that)."_

Don't get me wrong: **I would love to see Ruby support in the FaaS world**, but I don't think this is the way to go about it.

Here are some suggestions for a new headline (keep it more positive):

---

### Rubyists are Ready for Serverless
### Grow the FaaS Community with Ruby
### AWS Lambda: Grow the Serverless Community with Ruby
(here, have the "AWS Lambda" prefix automatically cycle between the other FaaS providers)

---

**Other suggestions?**

Am I alone in feeling hesitant to sign the petition as it is currently written?

首先查看 https://www.serverless-ruby.org/ 上的请愿书，并将其当前标题与此 issue 中提出的备选方案进行比较。检查这场包含七条评论的讨论是否已经确定了方向；当社区就修改后的措辞达成一致，并且请愿书反映了该决定时，即视为完成。

由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。