Interpreting anomaly detection results
- Vorherrschende Sprache
- Java
- Sterne
- 105
- Forks
- 249
- PR-Merge-Kennzahlen
- Keine gemergten PRs in 30 T.
Beschreibung
Our content about how to interpret anomaly detection job is currently spread about and it would be useful to see if it can be improved by pulling it together into a procedure that (ideally) could then be re-used in whole or in part in multiple solutions.
It should include:
- Differences between Anomaly Explorer and Single Metric Viewer (covered at high level in [tutorial](https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/machine-learning/current/ml-gs-results.html))
- Information about what you can glean from [influencers](https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/machine-learning/current/ml-influencers.html)
- Interpreting [multi-bucket](https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/machine-learning/current/ml-buckets.html#ml-bucket-results) anomalies
- A summary of the different types of results (e.g. model plot results, [influencer results](https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/machine-learning/current/ml-influencers.html#ml-influencer-results), [bucket results](https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/machine-learning/current/ml-buckets.html#ml-bucket-results), [record results](https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/elasticsearch/reference/7.4/ml-results-resource.html)
- Interpreting anomaly scores and how they are calculated and how they differ from probability.(covered at high level in [tutorial](https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/machine-learning/current/ml-gs-results.html))
- Meaning of "actual" and "typical" values (covered at high level in [tutorial](https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/machine-learning/current/ml-gs-results.html))
Beitragsleitfaden
Für dieses Repository ist kein Beitragsleitfaden indexiert
Rechercherichtung
Beginnen Sie mit dem verlinkten Tutorial zu Ergebnissen und den verlinkten Seiten zu Influencern, Multi-Bucket-Anomalien und ML-Ergebnissen. Fassen Sie das angeforderte Material zu einem wiederverwendbaren Verfahren zusammen, das Viewer, Ergebnistypen, Scores und Wahrscheinlichkeiten, tatsächliche und typische Werte, Influencer und Multi-Bucket-Anomalien abdeckt.
Vom Indexierungsmodell aus dem Issue-Text verfasst.
Bewertung
- Tech-Stack
- machine-learning
- Bereich
- documentation, machine-learning
- Issue-Typ
- Dokumentation
- Schwierigkeit
- 4/5
- Geschätzter Aufwand
- 3-5 Tage
- Aktivitätsstatus
- Veraltet
- Klarheit
- Größtenteils klar
- Anfängerfreundlichkeit
- 35/100