Potent confusion...?

A correspondent says:

It appears this site depicts "Counter potent" as would be expected of "Potent Counter potent", depicts "Potent Counter potent" as would be expected of "Potent in point", and depicts "Potent in point" & "Potent in pale" as would be expected of "Potent" because neither "Potent in point" nor "Potent in pale" are not drawn by this site at this time.
Some consider both "Potent Counter potent" & "Counter potent" to be synonymous.
Additionally, this site identifies Potent as a Fur, correctly, but it does not identify Potent as anything more than a Fur, such as a pattern when tinctures are written.
Consider: "Potent Sa. and Az." or "Counterpotent Gu. and Or."

未指定文件或测试。首先定位解析并渲染“Potent”、“Counter potent”、“Potent in point”和“Potent in pale”的 PHP 入口点，然后比较报告中示例生成的盾牌输出。完成的标准是这些术语按预期呈现出明确区别，并且 Potent 能在色彩模式中被识别。

由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。