SqlServer RevEng: Scaffold Included index columns
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100
Research direction
Start with the discussion in PR #22148 and trace how annotations are copied from ITableIndex to IIndex during SQL Server reverse engineering. Identify the provider extension point that needs to be added, then verify that scaffolded index columns preserve the relevant annotations.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
See https://github.com/dotnet/efcore/pull/22148#issuecomment-677814478
We need a new provider hook to handle annotations when we copy them from ITableIndex to IIndex.
- Dominant language
- C#
- Stars
- 14.8k
- Forks
- 3.4k
- Avg merge
- 2d 5h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 134
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from dotnet/efcore
-
Difficulty 4/5 3-5 days Newbie friendliness 55/100
-
customer-reported
Difficulty 5/5 Over a week Newbie friendliness 38/100
-
area-cosmos area-vector-search
Difficulty 5/5 Over a week Newbie friendliness 25/100
-
area-cosmos
Difficulty 5/5 Over a week Newbie friendliness 25/100
-
area-tools needs-design
Difficulty 4/5 3-5 days Newbie friendliness 25/100
Similar issues
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 86/100
-
:watch: Not Triaged 11.0 fundamentals/subsvc
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 92/100
dotnet/AspNetCore.Docs#37699 ·
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 72/100
SubtitleEdit/subtitleedit#15108 · 1 comment ·
-
area/docs-content Bug pulumi/docs
Difficulty 1/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 94/100
-
agentic-workflows untriaged
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 76/100