Add back warnings for ignored Includes
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100
Research direction
Start by locating the previous runtime warning for ignored Includes and the current Include-processing entry point. Determine which ignored cases the warning covered; done means the requested warnings are restored, while the analyzer idea remains explicitly optional in the issue.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
We --have-- used to have a runtime warning for this, but it may also be good to add an analyzer to catch the simple cases earlier.
- Dominant language
- C#
- Stars
- 14.8k
- Forks
- 3.4k
- Avg merge
- 2d 5h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 134
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from dotnet/efcore
-
Difficulty 4/5 3-5 days Newbie friendliness 55/100
-
customer-reported
Difficulty 5/5 Over a week Newbie friendliness 38/100
-
area-cosmos area-vector-search
Difficulty 5/5 Over a week Newbie friendliness 25/100
-
area-cosmos
Difficulty 5/5 Over a week Newbie friendliness 25/100
-
area-tools needs-design
Difficulty 4/5 3-5 days Newbie friendliness 25/100
Similar issues
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 86/100
-
:watch: Not Triaged 11.0 fundamentals/subsvc
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 92/100
dotnet/AspNetCore.Docs#37699 ·
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 72/100
SubtitleEdit/subtitleedit#15108 · 1 comment ·
-
area/docs-content Bug pulumi/docs
Difficulty 1/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 94/100
-
agentic-workflows untriaged
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 76/100