dotnet / dotnet/docs

The doc for CA1506 (and presumably related warnings) is succinct to the point of being hard to follow

未关闭
#32,905 0 条评论 0 个 reaction 已指派 0 人 在 GitHub 查看
dotnet-fundamentals/svc
主要语言
没有语言数据
星标
4.8k
派生
6.1k
平均合并
15 小时 21 分钟
30 天内合并 PR
370

描述

**Issue description**

A customer reported on the internal StackOverflow page that the doc page for CA1506 was inaccurate and useless. Having looked it over, I think its suggestions on how to suppress warnings seem accurate but are very succinct to the point where it is difficult for even an experienced software engineer to follow unless they work in developer tools. Furthermore, having links to other doc pages makes it harder to know what is important.

One additional way to suppress these warnings is adding `CA1506` to your MSBuild project or specifying it on the command line or in a Directory.Build.props, etc. That option was not mentioned in the doc page.

[This](https://stackoverflow.microsoft.com/questions/334729) is the StackOverflow post I referred to.

---
#### Document Details

⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*

* ID: d6bc7ccb-aab7-7e71-f5c5-82cd8fbef17f
* Version Independent ID: b5a70070-37a7-68ee-3ef4-969c961f4486
* Content: [CA1506: Avoid excessive class coupling (code analysis) - .NET](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/fundamentals/code-analysis/quality-rules/ca1506)
* Content Source: [docs/fundamentals/code-analysis/quality-rules/ca1506.md](https://github.com/dotnet/docs/blob/main/docs/fundamentals/code-analysis/quality-rules/ca1506.md)
* Product: **dotnet-fundamentals**
* GitHub Login: @gewarren
* Microsoft Alias: **gewarren**

贡献指南

打开贡献指南

评估

这个 Issue 还没有评估数据。

把新 issue 发到你的邮箱

精选适合新手参与的 GitHub issue 摘要。