decentralized-identity

decentralized-identity/didcomm-messaging

Stars: 193
Forks: 60
Open beginner issues: 0
Indexed issues: 40

Dominant language: JavaScript
License: Apache-2.0
Last GitHub push: May 6, 2024
Latest indexed: Sep 15, 2026
Contributing guide: No contributing guide
Code of conduct: No code of conduct
Beginner labels: No beginner labels indexed
PR merge metrics: No merged PRs in 30d

Open All

40 open issues indexed

Proof of work scheme to protect messaging endpoints in DIDComm Open

defer enhancement

decentralized-identity/didcomm-messaging#66 · 15 comments · 4 reactions · 0 assignees · Indexed Sep 15, 2026
"Composability" - Part 2 Open

defer editorial

decentralized-identity/didcomm-messaging#111 · 6 comments · 0 reactions · 1 assignee · Indexed Sep 15, 2026
Re-wrapping of forwarded messages should be mandatory Open

defer question

decentralized-identity/didcomm-messaging#162 · 3 comments · 0 reactions · 0 assignees · Indexed Sep 15, 2026
Has anyone thought about how to extend the DIDComm service endpoint block to support multiple transports? Open

defer enhancement question

decentralized-identity/didcomm-messaging#189 · 3 comments · 1 reaction · 0 assignees · Indexed Sep 15, 2026
Editorial nit - revisit PR #209 Open

extension needs discussion

decentralized-identity/didcomm-messaging#228 · 2 comments · 0 reactions · 0 assignees · Indexed Sep 15, 2026
Multiple keys of different types and Keys negotiation Open

defer

decentralized-identity/didcomm-messaging#238 · 5 comments · 1 reaction · 0 assignees · Indexed Sep 15, 2026
Lack of session and expensive key agreements steps could hurt adoption Open

defer

decentralized-identity/didcomm-messaging#243 · 18 comments · 5 reactions · 0 assignees · Indexed Sep 15, 2026
Correlation issue in case of multiplex encryption for multiple recipients Open

defer

decentralized-identity/didcomm-messaging#252 · 13 comments · 0 reactions · 1 assignee · Indexed Sep 15, 2026
Be able to encypt the message for multiple target keys of different types Open

defer

decentralized-identity/didcomm-messaging#253 · 4 comments · 0 reactions · 1 assignee · Indexed Sep 15, 2026
Optimization to use ECDH-1PU only on first setup and use 'dir' afterwards Open

defer enhancement

decentralized-identity/didcomm-messaging#255 · 5 comments · 0 reactions · 0 assignees · Indexed Sep 15, 2026
Are file extensions supposed to be registered with IANA? Open

defer

decentralized-identity/didcomm-messaging#262 · 8 comments · 0 reactions · 0 assignees · Indexed Sep 15, 2026
We need a terminology section Open

defer documentation

decentralized-identity/didcomm-messaging#285 · 0 comments · 0 reactions · 0 assignees · Indexed Sep 15, 2026
attachments - multiple representations present? Open

defer

decentralized-identity/didcomm-messaging#311 · 0 comments · 0 reactions · 1 assignee · Indexed Sep 15, 2026
Suggestion: look at implementing Crystals-Kyber as a key exchange algorithm in the spec Open

defer

decentralized-identity/didcomm-messaging#315 · 2 comments · 0 reactions · 0 assignees · Indexed Sep 15, 2026
shortened oob invitation and the `didcomm://` protocol scheme Open

defer

decentralized-identity/didcomm-messaging#351 · 6 comments · 0 reactions · 0 assignees · Indexed Sep 15, 2026
recommend check for the all-zero value after key agreement Open

defer

decentralized-identity/didcomm-messaging#378 · 1 comment · 0 reactions · 0 assignees · Indexed Sep 15, 2026
DIDComm incompatible with Sidetree/ION Open

decentralized-identity/didcomm-messaging#410 · 3 comments · 2 reactions · 0 assignees · Indexed Sep 15, 2026
DIDCommMessaging reference in did-spec-registries needs updating Open

decentralized-identity/didcomm-messaging#412 · 0 comments · 0 reactions · 0 assignees · Indexed Sep 15, 2026
"to" and "from" are not allowed to contain a keyID fragment but keyID is required for Message Layer Addressing Consistency Open

decentralized-identity/didcomm-messaging#413 · 1 comment · 0 reactions · 0 assignees · Indexed Sep 15, 2026
Routing protocol doesn't explain where to put the encrypted message in the attachment `data` properties Open

decentralized-identity/didcomm-messaging#414 · 0 comments · 0 reactions · 0 assignees · Indexed Sep 15, 2026
Broken links in main README Open

decentralized-identity/didcomm-messaging#418 · 0 comments · 0 reactions · 0 assignees · Indexed Sep 15, 2026
Typo in message structure Open

decentralized-identity/didcomm-messaging#419 · 2 comments · 0 reactions · 0 assignees · Indexed Sep 15, 2026
Clarify "json": "<json of protocol message>" as input for encoding example Open

decentralized-identity/didcomm-messaging#423 · 1 comment · 0 reactions · 0 assignees · Indexed Sep 15, 2026
pthid vs thid - Out Of Band - Message Correlation Open

decentralized-identity/didcomm-messaging#427 · 3 comments · 0 reactions · 0 assignees · Indexed Sep 15, 2026
Use maps instead triples for l10n inline strategy Open

decentralized-identity/didcomm-messaging#434 · 0 comments · 0 reactions · 0 assignees · Indexed Sep 15, 2026
Create simple test messages for Interop testing Open

decentralized-identity/didcomm-messaging#435 · 8 comments · 0 reactions · 0 assignees · Indexed Sep 15, 2026
Incompatibility with the did peer specs in the 'serviceEndpoint' Open

decentralized-identity/didcomm-messaging#438 · 3 comments · 2 reactions · 0 assignees · Indexed Sep 15, 2026
what is 'multi-hash'? Open

PR Needed

decentralized-identity/didcomm-messaging#441 · 7 comments · 0 reactions · 0 assignees · Indexed Sep 15, 2026
Out of band as an URI fragment Open

newminorversion

decentralized-identity/didcomm-messaging#443 · 1 comment · 0 reactions · 0 assignees · Indexed Sep 15, 2026
Confusion between JWM vs JWS and wrong examples Open

decentralized-identity/didcomm-messaging#446 · 1 comment · 0 reactions · 0 assignees · Indexed Sep 15, 2026
Move libraries and implementations from the README to the didcomm-book Open

decentralized-identity/didcomm-messaging#448 · 0 comments · 0 reactions · 0 assignees · Indexed Sep 15, 2026
PIURIs and MTURIs MUST follow semver Open

decentralized-identity/didcomm-messaging#452 · 1 comment · 0 reactions · 0 assignees · Indexed Sep 15, 2026
Group messaging query using DIDcomm-messaging Open

decentralized-identity/didcomm-messaging#454 · 5 comments · 0 reactions · 0 assignees · Indexed Sep 15, 2026
Thread sync with gossip-about-gossip and Cordial Dissemination Open

decentralized-identity/didcomm-messaging#456 · 2 comments · 0 reactions · 0 assignees · Indexed Sep 15, 2026
Unclear use of `tag` in key derivation and wrapping algorithm Open

decentralized-identity/didcomm-messaging#457 · 2 comments · 0 reactions · 0 assignees · Indexed Sep 15, 2026
Clarify that all recipient keys must be on the same curve Open

decentralized-identity/didcomm-messaging#458 · 0 comments · 0 reactions · 0 assignees · Indexed Sep 15, 2026
Consider using `_ooburl` parameter for shortened invitations instead of `_oobid` Open

decentralized-identity/didcomm-messaging#459 · 1 comment · 1 reaction · 0 assignees · Indexed Sep 15, 2026
Ed25519 sender private key "y" instead of "x" Open

decentralized-identity/didcomm-messaging#460 · 2 comments · 0 reactions · 0 assignees · Indexed Sep 15, 2026
Section 12.1.2 has a typo in the "kid" field Open

decentralized-identity/didcomm-messaging#461 · 0 comments · 0 reactions · 0 assignees · Indexed Sep 15, 2026
Transports: WebSocket frame type (text vs binary) is unspecified, and implementations disagree Open

decentralized-identity/didcomm-messaging#466 · 0 comments · 0 reactions · 0 assignees · Indexed Sep 15, 2026

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.