remote debugger failing on first hit with puma

Offen
#1,121 6 Kommentare 0 Reaktionen 0 zugewiesene Personen Auf GitHub ansehen

Dieses Issue hat noch niemand übernommen.

Bewertung

Schwierigkeit
4/5
Geschätzter Aufwand
3-5 Tage
Anfängerfreundlichkeit
35/100
Issue-Typ
Bug
Klarheit
Muss geklärt werden
Aktivitätsstatus
Veraltet
Tech-Stack
docker, ruby
Bereich
devtools

Rechercherichtung

Start by reproducing the first-hit failure with Ruby 3.3.5, rdbg 1.9.2, Puma in a local Docker container, and the Sinatra request flow described. Inspect the remote debugger behavior around the initial SIGURG and step transition, including the reported Puma and Rack paths. Done means the first breakpoint can be stepped through normally without losing context.

Vom Indexierungsmodell aus dem Issue-Text verfasst.

Beschreibung

Your environment

  • ruby -v: 3.3.5
  • rdbg -v: 1.9.2

Describe the bug
When hitting breakpoint via placing "debugger" into source code, and connecting with remote debugger, with sinatra controller and puma web server in local docker container, first time when "debugger" is hit will fail, as described below

For example,
Puma started freshly serving sinatra app in local docker container

    33|       def some_method_called_via_puma_via_sinatra_controller
=>  34|         debugger
    35|         some logic...
    37|       end
    38|
(rdbg:remote) n
# No sourcefile available for /usr/local/bundle/gems/puma-6.4.2/lib/puma/single.rb

Stop by SIGURG
(rdbg:remote) n
# it looks like it tries to step in code, but in reality context is lost
(rdbg:remote) n
[1, 7] in $(Gem)/rack-2.2.9/lib/rack/file.rb
     1| # frozen_string_literal: true
     2|
     3| require_relative 'files'
     4|
=>   5| module Rack
     6|   File = Files
     7| end
(rdbg:remote) c

Thus only way to end to proceed is to hit "continue", since control flow has jumped into some odd place, and now, after this failure when doing same request again, debugger works as espected (i.e. does not hit this "SIGURG" which seems to break thing).

Makes usage rather irritating since after every modify of code (and restart of web server thus), have to first hit debugger "cold", and failing, and hitting continue, and now it seems to be "hot", and can actually succeed.

To Reproduce

  • Local docker container
  • running sinatra app with puma on it
  • setting up remote debugger
  • adding breakpoint via placing "debugger" into code
  • launching app on container
  • performing some request hitting "debugger" put in code
  • connect remote debugger to process
    => fails on first time, if hitting continue, and retrying request it works as expected

Expected behavior
It would not fail on first time, since it makes debugging few cases difficult.

Additional context
Issue has been there for a while, i.e. it has had this failure always for me with this debug gem

Vorherrschende Sprache
Ruby
Sterne
1.3k
Forks
146
PR-Merge-Kennzahlen
Keine gemergten PRs in 30 T.

Beitragsleitfaden

Beitragsleitfaden öffnen

Erste Schritte

  1. Lesen Sie das ganze Issue und danach den Beitragsleitfaden des Projekts.
  2. Schreiben Sie ins Issue, dass Sie es übernehmen — das erspart doppelte Arbeit.
  3. Forken Sie das Repository und arbeiten Sie in einem Branch.
  4. Öffnen Sie einen Pull Request, der die Issue-Nummer nennt.

Mehr aus ruby/debug

Alle Issues in ruby/debug

Ähnliche Issues

Weitere Issues zu Ruby

Neue Issues direkt in Ihr Postfach

Eine kurze Übersicht über anfängerfreundliche GitHub-Issues.