Native Planner + Executor mode: pair a strong reasoning model with cheap execution models

Offen
#673 4 Kommentare 0 Reaktionen 0 zugewiesene Personen Auf GitHub ansehen

Dieses Issue hat noch niemand übernommen.

Bewertung

Schwierigkeit
5/5
Geschätzter Aufwand
Über eine Woche
Anfängerfreundlichkeit
25/100
Issue-Typ
Feature
Klarheit
Muss geklärt werden
Aktivitätsstatus
Ruhig
Tech-Stack
git
Bereich
ai, cli, devtools

Rechercherichtung

Beginne damit, die im Issue erwähnten bestehenden Abläufe für CLI, headless mode und Konfiguration zu prüfen. Lege vor der Implementierung die Rollen von planner und executor, die Isolation des worktree, die objective checks, das retry behavior und die model selection fest. Done sollte eine vereinbarte Spezifikation und einen validierten End-to-End-Ablauf umfassen, aber im Issue werden keine Dateien oder auszuführenden Tests genannt.

Vom Indexierungsmodell aus dem Issue-Text verfasst.

Beschreibung

Feature Description

Hey team! Following up on a conversation I had with Ahmad on X about this — wanted to put it here properly as a suggestion.

The idea: a native "planner + executor" mode for Command Code. A strong/frontier reasoning model (e.g. Claude, Kimi K3, GPT) acts as the planner — it reads the repo, breaks the task down into a plan (mission.md + task graph), and decides what can run in parallel. Cheap models (DeepSeek, Mimo, Minimax, etc.) act as executors, each running its assigned subtask isolated in its own git worktree. The planner then reviews the output against objective checks (tests/lint passing, not just "looks right"), and either merges + reports back to the user, or sends specific feedback back for a retry — escalating back to the planner if it fails a few attempts.

Diagram of the full flow below (drawn it out in Excalidraw so the loop is clear):

Image
Use Case

The core reasoning: what makes an agent make good decisions is the model's reasoning quality, not the price of the model doing the typing. Since the biggest cost driver is output tokens, using a frontier model to do everything — thinking AND writing every line of code — gets expensive fast. Splitting the roles (expensive model only for planning/reviewing, cheap models for the actual execution) keeps quality high while cutting cost a lot, especially running executors in parallel.

I already do a rough version of this manually today: I use Claude (in Claude Code) as the planner, and call cmdc in headless mode as the executor. It works, but it's a workaround. If Command Code supported this natively — right in the CLI, or eventually in a desktop app — with planner agent / executor agent as a first-class config, I think a lot of people would use it. Basically pairing the "brain" with the "worker."

Additional Context

Also roughly mocked up what the config UX could look like — a simple "select planner agent / select executor agent" step, so it's configurable per role instead of hardcoded:

Image

This is just a suggestion / starting point, not a finished spec — happy to help however's useful, whether that's more detail, testing, or feedback on implementation.

How important is this to you?

Nice to have

Vorherrschende Sprache
Keine Sprachdaten
Sterne
4k
Forks
350
PR-Merge-Kennzahlen
Keine gemergten PRs in 30 T.

Beitragsleitfaden

Für dieses Repository ist kein Beitragsleitfaden indexiert

Erste Schritte

  1. Lesen Sie das ganze Issue und danach den Beitragsleitfaden des Projekts.
  2. Schreiben Sie ins Issue, dass Sie es übernehmen — das erspart doppelte Arbeit.
  3. Forken Sie das Repository und arbeiten Sie in einem Branch.
  4. Öffnen Sie einen Pull Request, der die Issue-Nummer nennt.

Mehr aus CommandCodeAI/command-code

Alle Issues in CommandCodeAI/command-code

Ähnliche Issues

Weitere Issues zu AI Infra & Agents

Neue Issues direkt in Ihr Postfach

Eine kurze Übersicht über anfängerfreundliche GitHub-Issues.