[coverage] Conformance findings: AUTH-012,AUTH-015
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Newbie friendliness
- 45/100
- Issue type
- Bug
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Activity status
- Quiet
- Tech stack
- python
- Domain
- authentication, backend, security
Research direction
Start with the coverage PR diff under tests/, focusing on test_server_certificate_validation_enabled_by_default and test_mutual_tls_client_certificate_options_validated, then trace the Thrift and SEA connection paths they exercise. Done means both paths reject untrusted server certificates and incomplete or malformed client identity options with actionable TLS or client-key errors, without making OpenSession or CreateSession calls.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
Summary
Surfaced by the multi-language coverage fan-out while conformance-testing these SPEC-IDs against databricks/databricks-sql-python. Each finding is committed as an expected-failure (xfail) test in the coverage PR — the test asserts the CORRECT (post-fix) behavior and stays red until THIS driver (databricks/databricks-sql-python) is fixed, then flips green as a tripwire.
Findings
- AUTH-012 [sea]: kernel (SEA) rejects the untrusted server cert but the error drops rustls's UnknownIssuer cause, reporting only "http request failed after N attempts: error sending request for url (…)" — a TLS-trust misconfiguration is indistinguishable from a network outage
- failing test:
test_server_certificate_validation_enabled_by_default(see the coverage PR diff undertests/)
- failing test:
- AUTH-015 [thrift]: mTLS client-identity options get no both-or-neither validation: an unpaired _tls_client_cert_file reaches SSLContext.load_cert_chain(certfile=…, keyfile=None) and surfaces OpenSSL's opaque "[SSL] PEM lib", naming neither the supplied option nor the missing private key
- failing test:
test_mutual_tls_client_certificate_options_validated(see the coverage PR diff undertests/)
- failing test:
- AUTH-012: kernel (SEA) backend rejects an untrusted server certificate but its error drops the rustls cause, reporting only "http request failed after N attempts: error sending request for url (…)" — a TLS-trust misconfiguration is indistinguishable from a network outage
- AUTH-015: mTLS client-identity options get no both-or-neither validation: an unpaired
_tls_client_cert_filereachesload_cert_chain(certfile=…, keyfile=None)on the Thrift path and surfaces OpenSSL's opaque[SSL] PEM lib, naming neither the supplied option nor the missing private key
Reproduce & Expected
AUTH-012 — Verifies the driver is secure-by-default: with NO TLS options supplied, the driver performs full chain + hostname verification of the server certificate, and a server whose certificate does NOT chain…
Expected (per the shared spec):
- [thrift] exactly 0
OpenSessioncall(s) - [sea] exactly 0
CreateSessioncall(s) - full assertion contract:
result:
- error:
contains:
- certificate
- cert
- self-signed
- self signed
- unable to verify
- unable to get local issuer
- tls
- ssl
- handshake
protocol:
thrift:
- call_count:
method: OpenSession
expected: 0
sea:
- call_count:
operation: CreateSession
expected: 0
AUTH-015 — Verifies that the mutual-TLS (mTLS) client-identity options are validated on the client side with clear, actionable errors instead of failing opaquely deep in the TLS handshake.
Expected (per the shared spec):
- [thrift] exactly 0
OpenSessioncall(s) - [sea] exactly 0
CreateSessioncall(s) - full assertion contract:
result:
- label: both_or_neither
error:
contains:
- client cert
- clientcert
- client key
- clientkey
- private key
- mutual
- mtls
- both
- label: malformed_pem
error:
contains:
- pem
- certificate
- client cert
- clientcert
protocol:
thrift:
- call_count:
method: OpenSession
expected: 0
sea:
- call_count:
operation: CreateSession
expected: 0
Context
- The behavior was first fixed in a DIFFERENT driver — reference PR: https://github.com/databricks/databricks-sql-nodejs/pull/463 — which seeded the shared language-neutral spec. This issue tracks the same conformance gap in databricks/databricks-sql-python; the reference PR is for cross-referencing the intended behavior, NOT a change to this repo.
- Coverage PR carrying the reproducing xfail test(s): https://github.com/databricks/databricks-driver-test/pull/1115
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 233
- Forks
- 152
- Avg merge
- 21h 5m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 10
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from databricks/databricks-sql-python
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 78/100
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 76/100
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 78/100
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 72/100
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 84/100
All issues in databricks/databricks-sql-python
Similar issues
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 82/100
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 84/100
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 68/100
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 86/100
-
🐛 Bug 🔔 Pending processing
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 84/100
jumpserver/jumpserver#17584 ·