danielgtaylor / danielgtaylor/python-betterproto
to_dict() fails to write boolean fields without default when value is False
- Vorherrschende Sprache
- Python
- Sterne
- 1.8k
- Forks
- 234
- PR-Merge-Kennzahlen
- Keine gemergten PRs in 30 T.
Beschreibung
When you have a message with a boolean value as follows:
```
message Patient {
bool isRnaAvailable = 1;
}
```
then an object like
```
patient = Patient()
patient.is_rna_available = np.random.choice([True, False], 1)[0]
```
fails to write the `is_rna_available` field when it is False when calling `patient.to_dict()`, this does not happen when the value is True.
The issue seems to be in line 824 of file `betterproto/__init__py` where it runs the following comparison `elif v != self._get_field_default(field, meta) or include_default_values:`. It should be something like 'elif v != None or include_default_values', otherwise when you set a field to the same value as the default value and do not set `include_default values` then it is not written. This may be also the case for other types.
Beitragsleitfaden
Rechercherichtung
Start in betterproto/__init__.py at the to_dict() logic around line 824 and reproduce the Patient example with is_rna_available set to False. Check how fields equal to their defaults are handled, including other field types, and verify that the resulting dictionary preserves explicitly assigned false values without requiring include_default_values.
Vom Indexierungsmodell aus dem Issue-Text verfasst.
Bewertung
- Tech-Stack
- python
- Bereich
- api, backend
- Issue-Typ
- Bug
- Schwierigkeit
- 2/5
- Geschätzter Aufwand
- 1-3 Stunden
- Aktivitätsstatus
- Veraltet
- Klarheit
- Größtenteils klar
- Anfängerfreundlichkeit
- 35/100