csstools / csstools/postcss-plugins
CSS Values lvl 5, standard if() syntax
- Vorherrschende Sprache
- CSS
- Sterne
- 1.1k
- Forks
- 83
- Ø Merge
- 10 Std. 16 Min.
- Gemergte PRs (30 T.)
- 16
Beschreibung
### What would you want to propose?
Spec: https://drafts.csswg.org/css-values-5/#if-notation
This is the draft for a standard conditional selector.
There is a plugin that does similar thing called postcss-conditional-values, it could either be modified to support new experimental syntax, or a new plugin could be made partly based on it.
Would be nice to have a polyfill for this in the future with the standard syntax.
### Suggested solution
Spec allows media queries, and overall it is differs from postcss-conditional-values in a number of ways, so a new plugin is probably better.
Spec allows stuff like this:
```css
.valid-if {
--if-clause: media(width >= 600px): blue;
color: if(...var(--if-clause); else: green;);
}
```
I don't think is something that can be polyfilled
### Additional context
Overall this is more of a different syntax for queries, and doesn't replace postcss-conditional-values.
This request is related to https://github.com/csstools/postcss-plugins/issues/134 for some part.
### Validations
- [x] Follow our [Code of Conduct](https://github.com/csstools/postcss-plugins/blob/master/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md)
- [x] Check that there isn't already an issue that request the same feature to avoid creating a duplicate.
### Would you like to open a PR for this feature?
- [ ] I'm willing to open a PR
Beitragsleitfaden
Rechercherichtung
Start by reading the CSS Values Level 5 if() notation specification and comparing it with the existing postcss-conditional-values plugin. The issue does not name files, tests, or a defined implementation scope; done would require agreeing whether a new plugin can support a useful subset of the standard syntax and how that scope should be validated.
Vom Indexierungsmodell aus dem Issue-Text verfasst.
Bewertung
- Tech-Stack
- css
- Bereich
- frontend, web-dev
- Issue-Typ
- Feature
- Schwierigkeit
- 5/5
- Geschätzter Aufwand
- Über eine Woche
- Aktivitätsstatus
- Veraltet
- Klarheit
- Muss geklärt werden
- Anfängerfreundlichkeit
- 25/100