contentlayerdev / contentlayerdev/contentlayer
Define body as a field
- Langage dominant
- TypeScript
- Étoiles
- 3.5k
- Forks
- 192
- Métriques de merge des PR
- Aucune PR mergée en 30 j
Description
Building on #91, `body` is the one field that feels a little too magical. It _just works_, which is great, but maybe not entirely obvious.
Putting this issue here to discuss separately.
One thought I had was that if we pursued #91, it'd justify this move more to me. In this case, the `fields` definition would contain **every property** in the document that is generated without a preceding underscore (generated/reserved).
While I like the magic, I also wouldn't mind being more explicit in my schema definition. We could remove the `bodyType` option and instead have something like this:
```js
fields: {
title: { type: 'string', required: true },
body: { type: 'mdx', source: 'body' }
}
```
This is just a first pass. TBH I don't like the shape of the API suggested above. Just something to get us thinking about this.
Guide de contribution
Ouvrir le guide de contribution
Évaluation
Cette issue n'a pas encore été évaluée.