commonmark / commonmark/commonmark-java
Android: List.of() (API 30+) used in core since 0.24.0 contradicts the README's "minimum API level is 19"
Nadie ha tomado este issue todavía.
- Lenguaje dominante
- Java
- Estrellas
- 2.7k
- Forks
- 336
- Métricas de merge de PR
- Sin PR fusionados en 30 d
Descripción
Summary
Since 0.24.0 the core commonmark module uses java.util.List.of(...) (and a few Set.of/Map.of). On Android these methods exist only from API 30 (Android 11). The README still says:
It works on Android too, but that is on a best-effort basis, please report problems. For Android the minimum API level is 19
An app with minSdk < 30 that does not enable core library desugaring crashes on the first parse on API < 30 devices:
java.lang.NoSuchMethodError: No static method of(Ljava/lang/Object;)Ljava/util/List;
at org.commonmark.internal.InlineParserImpl.parse(InlineParserImpl.java)
This is the same class of problem as #366 / #373 (Objects.requireNonNullElseGet, fixed by #369). The List.of usages were introduced deliberately in #322 as a Java 11 clean-up, so this is a report that the clean-up and the Android support statement now disagree — not a claim that the change was wrong.
Steps to reproduce
Android app, minSdk 24, no coreLibraryDesugaring, org.commonmark:commonmark:0.30.0, run on an API 24–29 emulator:
Parser.builder().build().parse("*a*") // NoSuchMethodError: List.of
With isCoreLibraryDesugaringEnabled = true + com.android.tools:desugar_jdk_libs:2.1.5 the same code works on API 24 (verified on an API 24 emulator).
Where the API 30+ calls live (0.30.0, commonmark module)
List.of / Set.of / Map.of occurrences by file:
| File | Count |
|---|---|
internal/InlineParserImpl.java |
8 |
renderer/markdown/CoreMarkdownNodeRenderer.java |
3 |
renderer/html/CoreHtmlNodeRenderer.java |
3 |
parser/Parser.java |
3 (incl. Javadoc example) |
internal/ParagraphParser.java |
2 |
internal/IndentedCodeBlockParser.java |
2 |
renderer/text/CoreTextContentNodeRenderer.java, renderer/markdown/MarkdownRenderer.java, renderer/html/HtmlWriter.java, renderer/html/DefaultUrlSanitizer.java, parser/block/AbstractBlockParser.java, node/SourceSpans.java |
1 each |
0.22.0 had none; 0.24.0 introduced 8 in InlineParserImpl.
Why CI did not catch it
commonmark-android-test is only run through ./gradlew :app:lint in .github/workflows/ci.yml (minSdk 19, no emulator run), so a runtime NoSuchMethodError never surfaces there.
Possible resolutions
Either would be fine from a consumer's point of view — the important part is that the README and the code agree:
- Keep API 19 support — replace the factory calls with Java 8 equivalents (
Collections.emptyList()/singletonList(x)/unmodifiableList(Arrays.asList(a, b)), same forSet/Map). Mechanical, ~26 sites, keeps immutability. I can send a PR if you want this. - Document the new requirement — state in the README that Android needs API 30+ or core library desugaring, and ideally have
commonmark-android-testrun on an emulator (or fail lint onNewApi) so future regressions are visible.
Context: I hit this while building an Android Markdown renderer on top of commonmark-java (https://github.com/Jimmy-Jung/RichMarkdown-Android). We chose minSdk 30 for now, so this is not blocking us — reporting because the README statement is likely to mislead other Android users.
Guía de contribución
Primeros pasos
- Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
- Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
- Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
- Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.
Línea de trabajo
Comienza revisando las apariciones enumeradas de List.of, Set.of y Map.of en el módulo commonmark y la configuración de las pruebas de Android en .github/workflows/ci.yml. Reproduce el fallo en API 24–29 sin core library desugaring y, después, verifica que la resolución elegida mantenga coherentes el README, el comportamiento en tiempo de ejecución y las expectativas de compatibilidad con Android.
Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.
Evaluación
- Stack tecnológico
- android, java
- Área
- mobile-dev
- Tipo de issue
- Error
- Dificultad
- 4/5
- Tiempo estimado
- 3-5 días
- Estado de actividad
- Activo
- Claridad
- Bien especificado
- Aptitud para principiantes
- 74/100