commandlineparser / commandlineparser/commandline

Suggestion: Parsed class should have an ExtraArgs property

未关闭
#680 0 条评论 1 个 reaction 已指派 0 人 在 GitHub 查看
主要语言
C#
星标
4.8k
派生
478
PR 合并指标
30 天内没有已合并 PR

描述

The current way to catch any extra args at the end of the command line is to use an `IEnumerable` property (with the `Value` attribute and an index higher than any other `Value` attributes), which will end up catching all the extra args passed on the command line. I suggest that catching extra args is such a common scenario that the extra args should always be available to the library user, whether or not they have defined a final `IEnumerable` property in their option type. So I propose the following:

* ParserResult class, or perhaps just its Parsed subclass, gains an ExtraArgs property of type `IEnumerable`.
* The `WithParsed` methods in ParserResultExtensions gain another overload that takes an `Action>`. This will receive the parsed option instance as its first parameter, and the extra args, if any, as a second parameter. (If all args were parsed into the option instance, the extra args will be an empty `IEnumerable`, but it is guaranteed to **never be null**.)
* Likewise, the `WithParsed` methods in ParserResultExtensionsAsync will also gain an overload that takes a `Func, Task>`, and the second parameter is guaranteed to **never be null**.

Given the existence of issues like https://github.com/commandlineparser/commandline/issues/63, it seems clear that the current design of CommandLineParser where you don't have access to any "extra" args unless you put an `IEnumerable` into your options is not intuitive to everyone, and many people expect the library to hand them any extra args and let them decide what to do with them.

This would **NOT** be a breaking change, so it could go into a 2.x release, but I don't suggest holding up the 2.9 release to get this feature in.

贡献指南

这个仓库没有索引到贡献指南

评估

这个 Issue 还没有评估数据。

把新 issue 发到你的邮箱

精选适合新手参与的 GitHub issue 摘要。