Shortcomings with E2E tests
- Lenguaje dominante
- Sin datos de lenguaje
- Estrellas
- 3
- Forks
- 0
- Métricas de merge de PR
- Sin PR fusionados en 30 d
Descripción
Our E2E tests ostensibly have the following general goals:
- User journey validation (test key flows like workspace creation)
- Regression detection
- Production simulation (concurrent use, use components together to accomplish a task)
The tests cover each of these to some extent, but there are a number of key shortcomings which we should address - especially as the size of our team increases, institutional knowledge/memory becomes more dispersed, and our velocity ramps up.
## Lack of Terraform integration
Terraform is, let's face it, the core of our product. None of our E2E tests actually make use of Terraform, instead relying on the "echo" provisioner which mocks out responses.
## Lack of resilience / general flakiness / error handling
The tests are peppered with short timeouts to overcome races, brittle selectors used, lack of error handling or clear diagnostic logging.
## Authoring & troubleshooting
It's not possible to use the full gamut of Playwright's tools without a headed browser, which we don't currently (or maybe can't) make use of in our dogfood workspaces. Writing these tests therefore becomes tedious with a lot of learning required, and we should have a step-by-step guide for common troubleshooting tasks and reference implementations for the best tests to ~get Claude Code to rip off~ take inspiration from.
---
The purpose of this issue is not to throw shade on any individual(s); I didn't even `git blame` who owns most of the code.
We need to get this test suite under control before the tech debt starts becoming too expensive to service.
This test suite is our last line of defence besides for manual dogfooding, which is obviously sub-optimal in terms of time and reproducibility.
Guía de contribución
No hay ninguna guía de contribución indexada para este repositorio
Línea de trabajo
Empieza inventariando la suite E2E existente y su uso del echo provisioner; después, revisa los Playwright timeouts, selectors, el manejo de errores, el logging y las restricciones de headed-browser descritas aquí. El trabajo estaría terminado cuando se hayan acordado mejoras que cubran las pruebas respaldadas por Terraform, la resiliencia, el diagnóstico y las directrices de authoring, pero el issue no menciona ningún archivo ni test.
Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.
Evaluación
- Stack tecnológico
- playwright, terraform
- Área
- infrastructure, testing
- Tipo de issue
- Refactorización
- Dificultad
- 5/5
- Tiempo estimado
- Más de una semana
- Estado de actividad
- Estancado
- Claridad
- Necesita aclaración
- Aptitud para principiantes
- 25/100