bytecodealliance / bytecodealliance/ComponentizeJS
Supporting a 'wasm:' prefix on imports
- 主要語言
- Rust
- 星號
- 391
- 分支
- 53
- 平均合併
- 3 天 5 小時
- 30 天內合併 PR
- 1
描述
Right now, code that uses imports via WASI look like regular imports, with the package name being the first indicator:
```js
import { someFn } from "ns:pkg/iface@0.1.0";
export const run = {
run() { ... }
}
```
This works, but I think going forward life for embedders and tooling/ecosystem projects will be *much* easier if we prefix these imports with `wasi:` (or something similar) to note them/control how the imports are done.
The idea is that the above code would turn into:
```js
import { someFn } from "wasi:ns:pkg/iface@0.1.0";
export const run = {
run() { ... }
}
```
There are other ways to indicate the type of an import/control (i.e. [import attributes](https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Statements/import/with), for example) , but prefixing with `wasi:` is incredibly simple and offers a point of leverage -- being able to easily tell which imports are "wasi"/underlying paltform imports. This mirrors the convention of `node:` as an import prefix which is used in more modern code bases (i.e. `from "node:fs"` rather than `from "fs"`).
Changes may be required "below" *and* "above" componentize JS to make this work, but I figure that ComponentizeJS is a good place to discuss and eventually start this work.
[EDIT] I changed the title to `wasm` since `wasi` is clearly not the right prefix -- `wasm:`, `wit:`, `component:` or something else are clearly more correct, though it's not *exactly* clear which is best.
貢獻指南
這個儲存庫沒有索引到貢獻指南
研究方向
先閱讀 ComponentizeJS issue 的討論,並追蹤其中所示的 JavaScript imports 是如何處理的,包括被描述為位於 ComponentizeJS 上方和下方的變更。只有在社群就前綴達成共識,且選定的形式能夠端到端地用於 WASI 或 WebAssembly 元件 imports 後,工作才算完成。
由索引模型根據 Issue 內容生成。
評估
- 技術堆疊
- javascript, wasm
- 領域
- tooling
- Issue 類型
- 功能
- 難度
- 5/5
- 預估耗時
- 一週以上
- 活躍度
- 停滯
- 描述清晰度
- 需要釐清
- 新手友好度
- 25/100