Consider using wrapt with decorators
- Lenguaje dominante
- Python
- Estrellas
- 459
- Forks
- 223
- Merge medio
- 8 h 57 min
- PR fusionados (30 d)
- 13
Descripción
Now that we're using `@api_call` with all of our methods, they no longer can be introspected properly. For example, see http://box-python-sdk.readthedocs.io/en/latest/boxsdk.object.html#boxsdk.object.base_object.BaseObject.get .
We could potentially use wrapt (https://pypi.python.org/pypi/wrapt) to fix this. See https://github.com/GrahamDumpleton/wrapt/tree/develop/blog for more info.
Though this would potentially slow down the SDK code, so it might or might not be worth it. Perhaps it can be enabled when generating docs or using the terminal, but disabled otherwise.
Guía de contribución
Línea de trabajo
Start at the @api_call decorator and compare the documented BaseObject.get behavior with the introspection issue described in the linked documentation. Read the referenced wrapt material, then determine whether preserving introspection is worth the potential SDK performance cost and whether behavior should differ for documentation or terminal use.
Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.
Evaluación
- Stack tecnológico
- python
- Área
- developer-experience, documentation
- Tipo de issue
- Nueva funcionalidad
- Dificultad
- 4/5
- Tiempo estimado
- 3-5 días
- Estado de actividad
- Estancado
- Claridad
- Bastante claro
- Aptitud para principiantes
- 35/100