stabilization tracker: `bootc image copy-to-storage`
- Vorherrschende Sprache
- Rust
- Sterne
- 2.3k
- Forks
- 230
- Ø Merge
- 3 T. 12 Std.
- Gemergte PRs (30 T.)
- 38
Beschreibung
Original PR: https://github.com/containers/bootc/pull/620
This issue tracks the stabilization of `bootc image`, which currently just has one subcommand `bootc image copy-to-storage`.
## Rationale
We want to make it ergonomic and convenient to operate on the booted host image via e.g. `podman`. Today usage of podman defaults to operating on `/var/lib/containers`, a distinct mutable store.
Having the ability to conveniently copy the image to the booted storage aids with https://containers.github.io/bootc/booting-local-builds.html
## Concerns
- Longer term, we want to unify bootc and podman storage; but perhaps `copy-to-storage` can become a no-op
- Would it be better to try to instead expose an API to *read* from the bootc storage, and wrap that in a CLI?
Beitragsleitfaden
Rechercherichtung
Review original PR #620 and the current `bootc image copy-to-storage` entry point first. Compare its behavior with the booting-local-builds documentation and the stated Podman storage goal. Done requires an agreed stabilization direction—whether to retain, replace, or make the command a no-op—plus an implementation scope and validation plan.
Vom Indexierungsmodell aus dem Issue-Text verfasst.
Bewertung
- Tech-Stack
- rust
- Bereich
- cli
- Issue-Typ
- Feature
- Schwierigkeit
- 5/5
- Geschätzter Aufwand
- Über eine Woche
- Aktivitätsstatus
- Veraltet
- Klarheit
- Muss geklärt werden
- Anfängerfreundlichkeit
- 25/100