boostorg / boostorg/stacktrace
stacktrace_from_exception on non-x86
- 主要语言
- C++
- 星标
- 494
- 派生
- 86
- 平均合并
- 8 天 20 小时
- 30 天内合并 PR
- 3
描述
I submitted the below to the mailing list, but I wanted to re-iterate it here for more eyes. https://lists.boost.org/Archives/boost/2024/04/256604.php
This feature is guarded by BOOST_STACKTRACE_ALWAYS_STORE_IN_PADDING, but that is only enabled on [x86](https://github.com/boostorg/stacktrace/blob/a33e198cf660c213e700d6f050a4641b74ea880a/src/exception_headers.h#L9-L13).
This means that
```console
./bootstrap.sh --with-toolset=gcc --with-libraries=stacktrace
./b2 install threading=multi toolset=gcc
```
always fails to build on non-x86 platforms. There are three current workarounds:
1. set boost.stacktrace.from_exception=off
2. set BOOST_STACKTRACE_LIBCXX_RUNTIME_MAY_CAUSE_MEMORY_LEAK
3. build with threading=single
(1) prevents me from using this feature. (2) shouldn't be needed on it's face because I'm using gcc/libstdc++. (3) affects more than stacktrace.
Is this an incidental error, or is there a reason I wasn't able to deduce as to why this feature can't be used on non-x86+libstdc++?
It seems like the check for libc++ on non-x86 can't be entirely done at compile time. I definitely understand wanting to alert users to the dangers of using this feature, but there also doesn't seem to be a good way of detecting the presence of libc++ at compile time (hence the need for [is_libcpp_runtime](https://github.com/boostorg/stacktrace/blob/a33e198cf660c213e700d6f050a4641b74ea880a/src/from_exception.cpp#L81)).
贡献指南
这个仓库没有索引到贡献指南
调研方向
Reproduce the non-x86 build with the bootstrap.sh and b2 commands in the issue. Read src/exception_headers.h and src/from_exception.cpp, including is_libcpp_runtime, to trace the architecture and runtime checks. Done means the stacktrace library builds on non-x86 with GCC/libstdc++ without requiring the listed workarounds.
由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。
评估
- 技术栈
- cpp
- 领域
- devtools
- Issue 类型
- 缺陷
- 难度
- 4/5
- 预计耗时
- 3-5 天
- 活跃度
- 停滞
- 描述清晰度
- 基本清楚
- 新手友好度
- 35/100