Base class of non exposed derived class in Python side?
- Lingua principale
- C++
- Stelle
- 537
- Fork
- 223
- Merge medio
- 11h 22m
- PR unite (30g)
- 2
Descrizione
Hello, I have a use case where a polymorphism factory can instantiate object of a non exposed class. I have a multi-level inheritance scheme and the last level is not exposed to Python. What I try to understand is why the Python object of the last level takes the type of the top-most class in the inheritance hierarchy and not the one just above?
Here is a minimal example to reproduce the behavior:
C++ side
```
class Base
{
public:
Base() {}
virtual ~Base() = default;
};
class Derived: public Base
{
public:
Derived(int value) { m_value = value; }
~Derived() = default;
int getValue() { return m_value; }
private:
int m_value;
};
class DerivedTwo: public Derived
{
public:
DerivedTwo(int value): Derived(value) {}
~DerivedTwo() = default;
};
std::shared_ptr factory()
{
return std::make_shared(9);
}
std::shared_ptr factoryTwo()
{
return std::make_shared(99);
}
BOOST_PYTHON_MODULE(mymodule)
{
using namespace boost::python;
class_, boost::noncopyable>("Base", init<>());
class_, std::shared_ptr, boost::noncopyable>("Derived", init())
.def("get_value", &Derived::getValue)
;
def("factory", &factory);
def("factory_two", &factoryTwo);
}
```
Python side
```
import mymodule
obj = mymodule.factory()
print(type(obj))
obj2 = mymodule.factory_two()
print(type(obj2))
```
Output
```
<-- WHY?
```
Obviously, if I expose DerivedTwo class, all is OK.
Thanks for your help.
Guida per i contributori
Nessuna guida per i contributori indicizzata per questo repository
Valutazione
Questa issue non è ancora stata valutata.