boostorg / boostorg/math

The future of fpclassify.hpp

未關閉
#548 1 則留言 0 個 reaction 已指派 0 人 在 GitHub 檢視
主要語言
C++
星號
374
分支
264
平均合併
1 天 23 小時
30 天內合併 PR
17

描述

I'm opening this as a place for discussion really.

We currently have boost::math::fpclassify/isnan/isinf/isnormal etc which began life as workarounds for C++03 compilers, but they have another role: for IEEE conforming types they work even in the presence of -ffast-math.

Now, I have some dim recollection, that gcc/clang used to replace say `std::isnan(x)` with a literal `false` even with just -O3. And that we had some very inscrutable bug reports caused by this. However, that appears not to be the case with current releases, so perhaps this has been fixed/changed?

So... I'm undecided whether the boost functions should become synonyms for the std ones, but just wanted to flag the issue.

貢獻指南

這個儲存庫沒有索引到貢獻指南

評估

這個 Issue 還沒有評估資料。

把新 issue 寄到你的電子郵件信箱

精選適合新手參與的 GitHub issue 摘要。