bigbio / bigbio/quantms

Discussion about ConsesusID vs UniScore

Open
#558 0 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub
enhancement low-priority research-projects
Dominant language
Nextflow
Stars
83
Forks
57
Avg merge
4h 14m
Merged PRs (30d)
1

Description

### Description of feature

Hi all:

First benchmark against #quantms, claiming they are better on merging multiple search engines!!! Really nice to see quantms getting compare with other tools. Here the manuscript:

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1535947625001094?via%3Dihub

The claim:

```
Since the search engines used in this study were released quite some time ago, we compared them with the latest search
engines, including Sage(36) and MSFragger(37). Furthermore, we also examined a method called "quantms,"(30) which was recently developed for the purpose of reanalyzing repository-scale data by integrating search results from different engines.
The results are shown in Supplementary Table S5. These latest search engines identified more PSM than MaxQuant as
expected, but not as many as UniScore. Furthermore, UniScore outperformed quantms in merging results from multiple engines, regardless of whether our original search engine set or the search engine set used in the original quantms paper(30) was employed.
```

The Table in the supplementary information:

![Image](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/6dbe42fb-7d34-48e5-875e-0e3f63e51edd)

Contributor guide

Open the contributing guide

Assessment

This issue has not been assessed yet.

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.