Institution type remodel and impacts

## Epic user story
As a ministry user i want to re organize the institution types to allow for better data collection and more specific targeting of different institution types to align with policy.

PART 1
**Acceptance Criteria**
### Basic information

As a ministry user i want to re organize the institution types to allow for better data collection and more specific targeting of different institution types to align with policy.

**Acceptance Criteria**
### Basic information

- [ ] Remove the current design of institution type
- [ ] The Institution type will be defined by the information collected
- [ ] Add additional questions to the institution profile creation form subject to each institution type

####Profile creation questions update
- [ ] Country list function needs to be re usable as a component in other places
- [ ] Have Canada always prioritize to the top of the list

> What country is your institution located in?
> Drop down list with all countries
[(https://publications.gc.ca/collections/collection_2023/statcan/CS12-608-2023-eng.pdf)]
- [ ] Canada Selected then populate the following question(do not populate province question if Canada not selected)

> In which Canadian province is the organization located? Drop down list containing following values.
> Alberta
> British Columbia
> Manitoba
> New Brunswick
> Newfoundland and Labrador
> Nova Scotia
> Ontario
> Prince Edward Island
> Quebec
> Saskatchewan
> Territories (Yukon / NWT / Nunavut)

- [ ] Ask the following new questions no matter what country or province(if necessary) is selected.

> Is the organization public or private?
> o Public
> o Private
>
> Is the organization for profit or not for profit?
> o For Profit
> o Not for Profit
>
> Is the organization medical in nature?
> o Yes
> o No

### Mock ups
Canadian institution version

International version

### Ministry view of institution profile display

- [ ] Update to the ministry view so that the information is editable

### Data Alignment TBD

- [ ] For all current institutions flag no for medical unless they are currently an international medical school
- [ ] For all institutions that are currently flagged as public or private please align those factors with the new attribute
- [ ] For all institutions that do not have a current flag for private or public where it does not effect the outcome as per the table below leave as a null field to be collected
- [ ] For all international schools currently flagged as US please indicate that in the country section

### Mapping

- [ ] Included all new data and its relation to our current types with a highlight to the key factors that dictate if it should be each type.
- [ ] Map the new data to represent each old institution type for assessment and designation processes that rely on the current ones.

- [ ] Also the green fields are data that can be populated off the old institution type with certainty

## Ticket 2 UI updates

### Designation screen

- [ ] Show the new values at the top of the designation screen to represent new questions.
- [ ] Should be under the institution name and type

Institution view

## Ticket 3 Included new type data atributes

Data enhancement and collection

### Designation screen

- [ ] Show the new values at the top of the designation screen to represent new questions.
- [ ] Should be under the institution name and type

- [ ] Eligibility behaviors

Which designation shows:

- [ ] BC public designation (how is it referred to in the back end?)

- Canada
- BC
- Public

- [ ] BC Private Designation

- Canada
- BC
- Private

- [ ] Tuition Remittance

New eligibility ban all institutions with the following banners from doing remittance
Country other then Canada (validate if US included in this)

- [ ] View access (bc public vs everyone else)
Variables:
BC
Canada
Public = current BC Public behaviour
Online policy bc public private and everyone else.

**Additional Context**
- enter text here
- enter text here