about local BA and global BA
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- C++
- Stars
- 763
- Forks
- 235
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
hi, haomin
I'm very happy to read your papers. In RKD-SLAM, u report Efficient Incremental BA, which do local BA and global BA seamlessly without switch。
but In ICE-BA, u split local BA and global BA in two thread. why?
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
No source file, test, or entry point is named. Start by reviewing ICE-BA's local and global BA design alongside the referenced RKD-SLAM paper; done means providing a clear, maintainer-backed explanation of why the approaches differ.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- cpp
- Domain
- computer-vision
- Issue type
- Documentation
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 20/100