aws / aws/sagemaker-python-sdk

SageMaker Bring Your Own Container on local mode - ProcessingOutput is not linked to local filesystem

未关闭
#3,083 7 条评论 0 个 reaction 已指派 0 人 在 GitHub 查看
component: local mode component: pysdk-team Docker type: feature request
主要语言
Python
星标
2.3k
派生
1.3k
平均合并
1 天 22 小时
30 天内合并 PR
35

描述

**Describe the feature you'd like**
During the work with SageMaker BYOC on local mode (with Python SDK), we encountered the situation where the outputs of the container are staged into the SageMaker default artifact bucket. Then the SDK does not download those artifacts into the local file system.

**How would this feature be used? Please describe.**
We want that SDK will download the artifacts created automatically into the local file system.

**Describe alternatives you've considered**
We had to create a mechanism to download those files by ourselves:
![Lack_of_impl_on_S3_outputs_download](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/14873156/165520867-4f54f67c-b502-4250-98ae-b032a374d41c.png)
In the following snippet of code, we used [https://github.com/aws-samples/amazon-sagemaker-local-mode/blob/main/scikit_learn_bring_your_own_container_local_processing/scikit_learn_bring_your_own_container_local_processing.py ](https://github.com/aws-samples/amazon-sagemaker-local-mode/blob/main/scikit_learn_bring_your_own_container_local_processing/scikit_learn_bring_your_own_container_local_processing.py) as a reference (also used the output_config dictionary)

贡献指南

打开贡献指南

调研方向

Start with the Python SDK's local-mode ProcessingOutput handling and the output_config dictionary described in the issue. Read the linked scikit_learn_bring_your_own_container_local_processing.py example as a behavioral reference; done means artifacts staged in the default SageMaker bucket are automatically downloaded to the local filesystem.

由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。

评估

技术栈
aws, python
领域
cloud, machine-learning
Issue 类型
功能
难度
4/5
预计耗时
3-5 天
活跃度
停滞
描述清晰度
基本清楚
新手友好度
35/100

把新 issue 发到你的邮箱

精选适合新手参与的 GitHub issue 摘要。