aws / aws/bedrock-agentcore-sdk-python
[Feature] @kb_transformation decorator for Knowledge Base custom transformation Lambdas
- Lingua principale
- Python
- Stelle
- 761
- Fork
- 147
- Merge medio
- 1g 23h
- PR unite (30g)
- 7
Descrizione
## Summary
Knowledge Bases supports [custom transformation Lambda functions](https://docs.aws.amazon.com/bedrock/latest/userguide/kb-custom-transformation.html) that run during ingestion to apply custom chunking or metadata enrichment. Today, customers must manually parse the KB event format, read/write content batches from S3, and return the exact expected response structure — significant boilerplate that obscures the actual transformation logic.
The SDK should provide a `@kb_transformation` decorator that handles all the plumbing (S3 I/O, event parsing, batch iteration, and response formatting) so the customer only writes their transformation logic.
## Proposed API
```python
from bedrock_agentcore.knowledge_base import kb_transformation
@kb_transformation
def my_chunker(content: str, metadata: dict) -> list[dict]:
"""Custom chunking — split on headings and enrich metadata."""
chunks = content.split("\n# ")
return [
{"contentBody": chunk, "contentMetadata": {"section": i}}
for i, chunk in enumerate(chunks)
]
```
The decorator would:
1. **Parse the Lambda event** — extract the S3 bucket/key for the input content batch and the output location
2. **Handle S3 I/O** — read content objects from S3, write transformed output back to S3
3. **Iterate over batches** — call the user function once per document/content item in the batch
4. **Format the response** — return the exact structure the Knowledge Bases ingestion pipeline expects
## Current pain points (without the decorator)
- Customers must understand and implement the undocumented event schema for the transformation Lambda
- S3 read/write logic (including error handling, content-type detection) must be implemented from scratch
- Batch iteration and response assembly is repetitive boilerplate across every transformation Lambda
- Small mistakes in the response structure cause silent ingestion failures that are hard to debug
## Expected behavior
- The decorator should accept a function with signature `(content: str, metadata: dict) -> list[dict]` at minimum
- Each dict in the return list represents a chunk with at least `contentBody` (str) and optionally `contentMetadata` (dict)
- The decorator should handle all S3 operations, event parsing, and response formatting transparently
- Errors in the user function should surface clearly rather than being swallowed by the S3/response plumbing
- Should work as a standard AWS Lambda handler (compatible with `lambda_handler` entry point patterns)
## Additional considerations
- Should the decorator support async transformation functions?
- Should there be a lower-level variant that gives access to the raw batch (for cases where per-document iteration isn't desired)?
- Consider exposing the source document metadata (filename, content type, data source ID) to the user function for context-aware transformations
## References
- [Knowledge Bases Custom Transformation User Guide](https://docs.aws.amazon.com/bedrock/latest/userguide/kb-custom-transformation.html)
- [AgentCore SDK Knowledge Bases design doc](https://quip-amazon.com/aMbfABnehnH7#LPc9AAhEqQj)
Guida per i contributori
Apri la guida per i contributori
Direzione di ricerca
Inizia dalla guida alla trasformazione personalizzata di AWS Knowledge Bases e dal documento di progettazione di AgentCore SDK collegato, quindi esamina i pattern esistenti per il punto di ingresso lambda_handler. Il lavoro è completato quando è disponibile un’API @kb_transformation documentata che gestisce il parsing dell’evento indicato, l’I/O S3, l’iterazione dei batch, la formattazione della risposta e gli errori chiari della funzione utente, e sono state prese decisioni sulle questioni async, raw-batch e metadata elencate.
Scritto dal modello di indicizzazione a partire dal testo della issue.
Valutazione
- Stack tecnologico
- aws, python
- Ambito
- backend, cloud
- Tipo di issue
- Funzionalità
- Difficoltà
- 5/5
- Tempo stimato
- Più di una settimana
- Stato di attività
- Tranquilla
- Chiarezza
- Abbastanza chiara
- Idoneità per principianti
- 38/100