Feature-Fluid Compute Pricing
- Dominant language
- No language data
- Stars
- 196
- Forks
- 5
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
**Note**
> * Please vote on this issue by adding a 👍 reaction to the original issue to help the community and maintainers prioritize this request
> * Please do not leave "+1" or "me too" comments, they generate extra noise for issue followers and do * not help prioritize the request
> If you are interested in providing additional feedback, please leave a comment
**Description**
When calling 3rd party services such as LLMs, the lambda sits blocked on the network read, which customers are charged for, while that CPU is very likely doing other useful work. This at least is my understanding, and this doesn't seem right.
Vercel has added a variant of this called 'Fluid Compute Pricing' (on top of Lambda??): https://vercel.com/docs/functions/usage-and-pricing
Lambda should natively support this! And better i'm sure.
**Additional context**
Some of the other issues might be related to this in theory so happy to see this closed if other use cases take on this fundamental shift;
https://github.com/aws/aws-lambda-roadmap/issues/57
https://github.com/aws/aws-lambda-roadmap/issues/16
Contributor guide
Research direction
Start by reviewing the linked AWS Lambda roadmap issues and the Vercel Fluid Compute Pricing documentation. The issue does not name files, tests, or an implementation entry point; first establish the intended pricing model, scope, and relationship to those existing issues. Done would require an accepted product and implementation direction, not a self-contained code change.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- aws
- Domain
- cloud
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 20/100