For boolean properties, support "hasPropertyName(boolean expectedValue)"

Currently if a class has a boolean field / property (say **hideLegend,** the assertion generator produces two methods: **isHideLegend()** and **isNotHideLegend**. It would be really helpful to have an additional method **hasHideLegend(boolean expectedValue)**. To keep with the **BooleanAssert** pattern, this might become **hasHideLegendEqualTo(boolean)** and **hasHideLegendNotEqualTo(boolean)**. This is demonstrated by the example below:

```
private void testHelperMethod(MyAssertionClass instanceUnderTest, SomeInput input){
boolean expectedHasLegend = // some code that uses input to determine expected legend;
MyAssertionClassAssert assert = Assertions.assertThat(instanceUnderTest);

if (expectedHadLengeng)
assert.isHideLegend();
else
assert.isNotHideLegend();
}
```

The above could become:

```
private void testHelperMethod(MyAssertionClass instanceUnderTest, SomeInput input){
boolean expectedHasLegend = // some code that uses input to determine expected legend;
Assertions.assertThat(instanceUnderTest)
hasHideLegend(expectedHasLegend );
}
```

Inizia individuando la logica del generatore di assertion che crea metodi per le proprietà booleane, quindi confronta l’API richiesta con il pattern BooleanAssert esistente. Decidi se il metodo generato debba essere hasHideLegend(boolean) o varianti specifiche per l’uguaglianza, e aggiungi una copertura che dimostri che l’assertion generata gestisce entrambi i valori booleani attesi.

Scritto dal modello di indicizzazione a partire dal testo della issue.