arrayfire / arrayfire/arrayfire-rust
[BUG] `af_set_backend` is declared with the wrong parameter width
- Vorherrschende Sprache
- Rust
- Sterne
- 827
- Forks
- 59
- PR-Merge-Kennzahlen
- Keine gemergten PRs in 30 T.
Beschreibung
[`src/core/backend.rs:7`](https://github.com/arrayfire/arrayfire-rust/blob/master/src/core/backend.rs#L7):
```rust
extern "C" {
fn af_set_backend(bknd: u8) -> c_int;
```
The C signature (`include/af/backend.h:24`) is:
```c
AFAPI af_err af_set_backend(const af_backend bknd);
```
`af_backend` is a C enum, i.e. 4-byte `int` under both MSVC and GCC. Declaring the parameter as `u8` is an ABI type mismatch.
In practice it works, because rustc emits `zeroext` for the `u8` argument and the callee reads a clean value from the full register — I checked the IR (`declare noundef i32 @af_set_backend(i8 noundef zeroext)`). So this is as a latent correctness issue rather than an active bug, but it should still be `c_uint` to match the C ABI.
The three neighbouring declarations in the same `extern` block already use `c_uint`/`c_int` correctly.
---
Found by Claude Opus 5.
Beitragsleitfaden
Für dieses Repository ist kein Beitragsleitfaden indexiert
Rechercherichtung
Start in src/core/backend.rs:7 and compare af_set_backend with the neighboring declarations in the same extern block. Check include/af/backend.h:24 to confirm the C enum type, update the Rust declaration to match the ABI, then run the repository's Rust checks or tests. Done means the declaration uses the correct parameter width and the checks pass.
Vom Indexierungsmodell aus dem Issue-Text verfasst.
Bewertung
- Tech-Stack
- c, rust
- Bereich
- backend
- Issue-Typ
- Bug
- Schwierigkeit
- 1/5
- Geschätzter Aufwand
- Unter einer Stunde
- Aktivitätsstatus
- Ruhig
- Klarheit
- Klar beschrieben
- Anfängerfreundlichkeit
- 88/100