appsmithorg / appsmithorg/appsmith
[Feature]: add Zenith Hosting as a row in the README installation methods table
- Langage dominant
- TypeScript
- Étoiles
- 40.9k
- Forks
- 4.8k
- Merge moyen
- 1 j 22 h
- PR mergées (30 j)
- 45
Description
### Is there an existing issue for this?
- [x] I have searched the existing issues
### Summary
hey, i work on Zenith Hosting, a startup doing one-click hosting for open source apps. we added Appsmith to our marketplace, so i would like to add one row to the Installation Methods table in `README.md`, alongside the existing Docker / Kubernetes / AWS AMI rows, linking to https://zenith.hosting/host/appsmith.
it would be a single line, additions only, using a height-matched badge so it sits level with the existing `for-the-badge` shields. it is meant as one more option in that list, not as a replacement for any of them, and it does not touch the Appsmith Cloud line above the table.
raising this first per the contribution guidelines. PR #42078 is already open as a draft with the exact diff if it is easier to look at that.
### Why should this be worked on?
people who want self-hosted Appsmith rather than Appsmith Cloud currently have to run and maintain the server themselves, which is where a chunk of them stall. the table is the place they look for that, so listing a managed option there is one less dead end for the non-devops end of your self-host audience.
happy to reword it, move it, or close this if you would rather not link third-party hosts in the README. we also share a cut of revenue with the projects we host, happy to explain if you're curious: hello@zenith.hosting
Guide de contribution
Ouvrir le guide de contribution
Piste de recherche
Review README.md's Installation Methods table and compare the proposed placement and badge with the neighboring Docker, Kubernetes, and AWS AMI rows. PR #42078 contains the exact diff; done means the agreed Zenith Hosting row is present without changing the Appsmith Cloud line or existing options.
Rédigé par le modèle d'indexation à partir du texte de l'issue.
Évaluation
- Stack technique
- markdown
- Domaine
- documentation
- Type d'issue
- Documentation
- Difficulté
- 1/5
- Temps estimé
- Moins d'une heure
- Activité
- À l'abandon
- Clarté
- Clairement spécifiée
- Accessibilité débutants
- 25/100