`AlreadyClosed` exception when using `topicsPattern`

We are unable to cleanly close our consumer when using `topicsPattern`:

```
2020-10-27 11:15:43.304 INFO [0x70000d6d5000] ConnectionPool:85 | Created connection for pulsar://pulsar.data-access-platform-portal.docker:6650
2020-10-27 11:15:43.307 INFO [0x70000ef61000] ClientConnection:343 | [192.168.99.1:58802 -> 192.168.99.100:6650] Connected to broker
Closing consumer...
(node:35996) UnhandledPromiseRejectionWarning: Error: Failed to close consumer: AlreadyClosed
(node:35996) UnhandledPromiseRejectionWarning: Unhandled promise rejection. This error originated either by throwing inside of an async function without a catch block, or by rejecting a promise which was not handled with .catch(). (rejection id: 1)
(node:35996) [DEP0018] DeprecationWarning: Unhandled promise rejections are deprecated. In the future, promise rejections that are not handled will terminate the Node.js process with a non-zero exit code.
```

That's the result from running this code snippet (with the appropriate docker container running):

```
const Bluebird = require('bluebird')
const Pulsar = require('pulsar-client')

const doit = async () => {
const client = new Pulsar.Client({
webServiceUrl: 'http://pulsar.data-access-platform-portal.docker:8080',
serviceUrl: 'pulsar://pulsar.data-access-platform-portal.docker:6650'
})
const consumer = await client.subscribe({
topicsPattern: `non-persistent://public/default/topic`,
subscription: 'test-subscription',
subscriptionType: 'Shared',
subscriptionInitialPosition: 'Earliest'
})

// Rather than push messages to consume, we're just waiting for a second
await Bluebird.delay(1000)

console.log('Closing consumer...')
// We've also tried omitting this line, but it still produces errors
await consumer.close()
console.log('Closing client...')
await client.close()
}

doit()
```

We've tried this with node versions 10.16.3, 12.16.0, and 14.11.0 and pulsar 2.6.1.

I _suspect_ that the root cause is that it _appears_ that the consumer implementation in this library makes the assumption that there's only a single consumer - https://github.com/apache/pulsar-client-node/blob/f010fb2ed3c530af8006ba3d3a7b73c6b46f6507/src/Consumer.cc#L178 overwrites the wrapper's consumer with each invocation. While this wouldn't be a problem with a single topic, it seems that the last consumer "wins" in that it gets stitched up to be the consumer saved in the wrapper. However, there may be a race condition for whether the listener handler stitched up correctly from the config (https://github.com/apache/pulsar-client-node/blob/f010fb2ed3c530af8006ba3d3a7b73c6b46f6507/src/Consumer.cc#L184 but then the consumer config is subsequently deleted).

Looking at `ClientImpl` in the pulsar C++ code, it appears that it also takes responsibility for closing any open consumers and producers, so we tried also just relying on the client in order to close the consumers (since `ClientImpl` appears to correctly track all newly-created consumers), but that _also_ reproduces with `AlreadyClosed` getting thrown.

All that said, it is a little tricky to track all of it because of the number of levels of indirection - from the JS to the C++ extension to the C bindings which delegate out to the C++ client code. So we might be way off 😆

Reproduziere das bereitgestellte Node.js-Snippet mit Pulsar 2.6.1 und verfolge anschließend die Erstellung und das Herunterfahren des Consumers durch src/Consumer.cc, insbesondere die referenzierten Zeilen 178 und 184. Vergleiche dieses Verhalten mit der Bereinigung von Consumern und Produzenten durch ClientImpl. Als abgeschlossen gilt die Aufgabe, wenn das Schließen von Consumer und Client ohne einen AlreadyClosed-Fehler oder eine unbehandelte Promise-Ablehnung abgeschlossen wird.

Vom Indexierungsmodell aus dem Issue-Text verfasst.