apache / apache/pulsar-client-cpp
[pulsar-client-cpp] Partition key from producer does arrive in broker
- 主要语言
- C++
- 星标
- 71
- 派生
- 90
- 平均合并
- 2 小时 33 分钟
- 30 天内合并 PR
- 3
描述
**Describe the bug**
When using the Java client producer, the setting of Key in MessageBuilder correctly coveys this metadata to the broker. C++ client consumers can then successfully use _Key_Shared_ subscription on this topic and we're seeing the expected keys-based consumption behavior.
However, when we use a C++ client producer, we do not get a "shared key" consumption behavior over the subscribed consumers.
**To Reproduce**
Steps to reproduce the behavior:
1. Initiate a Java client producer. Add a Key to the MessageBuidler.
2. Send messages using the MessageBuilder
3. Initiate two C++ consumers using the "Key_Shared" subscription
4. See key-based distributed messages over the consumers.
5. Now stop the Java client producer
6. Start a CPP client producer that sets the same metadata
7. Now only one of the C++ client consumers retrieves all messages
**Expected behavior**
We'd expect to see the same "key-shared" message distribution over the consumers with a C++ client producer as with its Java equivalent.
**Additional context**
We suspect a difference in the protobuf schema between the Java and C++ client producers for setting the partition or ordering key and conveying this metadata to the broker. It seems that the broker does not receive the message metadata from the C++ client producer correctly.
NB: We are using the same version of C++ client and broker (both from Pulsar v2.5.0).
贡献指南
调研方向
从 C++ producer 的 MessageBuilder 开始,将其 key 或 ordering-key 元数据的序列化方式与复现步骤中描述的 Java producer 行为进行比较。使用 Pulsar 2.5.0,通过两个 C++ Key_Shared consumer 和两种 producer 类型复现该问题。当 C++ producer 在各 consumer 之间产生与 Java producer 相同的基于 key 的分配时,即视为完成。
由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。
评估
- 技术栈
- cpp, java
- 领域
- distributed-systems
- Issue 类型
- 缺陷
- 难度
- 4/5
- 预计耗时
- 3-5 天
- 活跃度
- 停滞
- 描述清晰度
- 基本清楚
- 新手友好度
- 35/100