Variant field names not being ordered correctly via UTF-8 byte order

### Describe the bug, including details regarding any error messages, version, and platform.

The Variant spec requires the field ids in an object's header to be sorted by the
**UTF-8 byte order** of the field names, so a reader can binary-search them.
`VariantBuilder` sorted the fields — and `Variant.getFieldByKey` binary-searched them —
using `String.compareTo`, which orders by **UTF-16 code units**, not UTF-8 bytes.

The two orderings are identical for all field names in the Basic Multilingual Plane, but
they diverge for names containing supplementary-plane characters (U+10000 and above):
`String.compareTo` orders a leading high surrogate (0xD800–0xDBFF) before code points in
U+E000..U+FFFF, whereas UTF-8 byte order (and the spec) orders them after. Consequences:

- An object parquet-java builds with such keys has field ids sorted in an order that
violates the spec.
- A spec-compliant reader (e.g. the Apache Arrow C++/Rust/Go Variant readers) binary-searching
that object can fail to find fields.
- Conversely, parquet-java's own binary search fails to find a supplementary-plane key in an
object produced by a spec-compliant writer.

The bug only surfaces when an object both contains a supplementary-plane key and is large
enough to take the binary-search path, so it has gone unnoticed.

### Component(s)
Core

Beginne mit VariantBuilder und Variant.getFieldByKey und reproduziere dann das Problem anhand eines Objekts mit einem Feldnamen aus der Supplementary Plane und genügend Feldern, um eine binäre Suche auszulösen. Überprüfe, dass die Feld-IDs der UTF-8-Byte-Reihenfolge folgen und dass die Suche für Objekte erfolgreich ist, die sowohl von parquet-java als auch von spezifikationskonformen Writern erzeugt wurden.

Vom Indexierungsmodell aus dem Issue-Text verfasst.