`integer overflow` in CapacityByteArrayOutputStream

### Describe the bug, including details regarding any error messages, version, and platform.

The following exception was thrown when we read a column of `ARRAY` in Spark 3.5.0 and Parquet 1.15.2

```
Caused by: java.lang.ArithmeticException: integer overflow
at java.base/java.lang.Math.addExact(Math.java:883)
at org.apache.parquet.bytes.CapacityByteArrayOutputStream.addSlab(CapacityByteArrayOutputStream.java:198)
at org.apache.parquet.bytes.CapacityByteArrayOutputStream.write(CapacityByteArrayOutputStream.java:220)
at org.apache.parquet.bytes.LittleEndianDataOutputStream.write(LittleEndianDataOutputStream.java:76)
at java.base/java.io.OutputStream.write(OutputStream.java:127)
at org.apache.parquet.io.api.Binary$ByteArrayBackedBinary.writeTo(Binary.java:319)
at org.apache.parquet.column.values.plain.PlainValuesWriter.writeBytes(PlainValuesWriter.java:55)
at org.apache.parquet.column.values.fallback.FallbackValuesWriter.writeBytes(FallbackValuesWriter.java:178)
at org.apache.parquet.column.impl.ColumnWriterBase.write(ColumnWriterBase.java:196)
at org.apache.parquet.io.MessageColumnIO$MessageColumnIORecordConsumer.addBinary(MessageColumnIO.java:473)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.datasources.parquet.ParquetWriteSupport.$anonfun$makeWriter$9(ParquetWriteSupport.scala:212)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.datasources.parquet.ParquetWriteSupport.$anonfun$makeWriter$9$adapted(ParquetWriteSupport.scala:210)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.datasources.parquet.ParquetWriteSupport.$anonfun$makeArrayWriter$5(ParquetWriteSupport.scala:354)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.datasources.parquet.ParquetWriteSupport.consumeField(ParquetWriteSupport.scala:490)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.datasources.parquet.ParquetWriteSupport.$anonfun$makeArrayWriter$4(ParquetWriteSupport.scala:354)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.datasources.parquet.ParquetWriteSupport.consumeGroup(ParquetWriteSupport.scala:484)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.datasources.parquet.ParquetWriteSupport.$anonfun$makeArrayWriter$3(ParquetWriteSupport.scala:352)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.datasources.parquet.ParquetWriteSupport.consumeField(ParquetWriteSupport.scala:490)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.datasources.parquet.ParquetWriteSupport.$anonfun$makeArrayWriter$2(ParquetWriteSupport.scala:347)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.datasources.parquet.ParquetWriteSupport.consumeGroup(ParquetWriteSupport.scala:484)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.datasources.parquet.ParquetWriteSupport.$anonfun$makeArrayWriter$1(ParquetWriteSupport.scala:346)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.datasources.parquet.ParquetWriteSupport.$anonfun$makeArrayWriter$1$adapted(ParquetWriteSupport.scala:342)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.datasources.parquet.ParquetWriteSupport.$anonfun$writeFields$1(ParquetWriteSupport.scala:168)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.datasources.parquet.ParquetWriteSupport.consumeField(ParquetWriteSupport.scala:490)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.datasources.parquet.ParquetWriteSupport.writeFields(ParquetWriteSupport.scala:168)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.datasources.parquet.ParquetWriteSupport.$anonfun$write$1(ParquetWriteSupport.scala:158)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.datasources.parquet.ParquetWriteSupport.consumeMessage(ParquetWriteSupport.scala:478)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.datasources.parquet.ParquetWriteSupport.write(ParquetWriteSupport.scala:158)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.datasources.parquet.ParquetWriteSupport.write(ParquetWriteSupport.scala:54)
at org.apache.parquet.hadoop.InternalParquetRecordWriter.write(InternalParquetRecordWriter.java:152)
at org.apache.parquet.hadoop.ParquetRecordWriter.write(ParquetRecordWriter.java:240)
at org.apache.parquet.hadoop.ParquetRecordWriter.write(ParquetRecordWriter.java:41)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.datasources.parquet.ParquetOutputWriter.write(ParquetOutputWriter.scala:39)
```

The issue can be worked around by increasing `spark.sql.shuffle.partitions` to divide data into smaller partitions.
Can it be solved at parquet side?

### Component(s)

Core

Start with CapacityByteArrayOutputStream.java, especially addSlab at line 198 and write at line 220, then reproduce the reported ARRAY write scenario using Spark 3.5.0 and Parquet 1.15.2. Trace how the capacity calculation reaches Math.addExact and confirm that the integer-overflow failure is prevented without breaking large writes.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.