should not use seek() for skipping very small column chunks. better to read and ignore data.
- Lingua principale
- Java
- Stelle
- 3.1k
- Fork
- 1.6k
- Merge medio
- 3g 12h
- PR unite (30g)
- 33
Descrizione
### Describe the enhancement requested
When reading some column chunks but not all, parquet is building a list of "ConsecutivePartList", then trying to call the Hadoop api for vectorized reader of FSDataInputStream#readVectored(List ...)
Unfortunatly, many implementations of "FSDataInputStream" do not override the readVectored() method, which trigger many distinct calls to read.
For example on hadoop-azure, the Azure Datalake Storage is much slower at establishing a new Https connection (using infamous calls HttpURLConnection for jdk 1.0, then doing TLS hand-shake), that to get only few more megas of data on an existing socket !!
The case with small wholes to avoid reading is very frequent when having columns in parquet files that are not read, and are highly compressed because of RLE encoding. Typically, a very sparse column with only few values, or even always null within a page. Such a column could be encoded in only few hundred of bytes by parquet, so it is NOT a problem of reading 100 bytes more.
Parquet should at least honor the following method from hadoop class FileSystem, that says that a seek of less than 4096 bytes is NOT reasonable.
```
/**
* What is the smallest reasonable seek?
* @return the minimum number of bytes
*/
default int minSeekForVectorReads() {
return 4 * 1024;
}
```
The logic for building this List for a list of column chunks is here:
org.apache.parquet.hadoop.ParquetFileReader#internalReadRowGroup
```
private ColumnChunkPageReadStore internalReadRowGroup(int blockIndex) throws IOException {
...
for (ColumnChunkMetaData mc : block.getColumns()) {
...
// first part or not consecutive => new list
if (currentParts == null || currentParts.endPos() != startingPos) { // <===== SHOULD honor minSeekForVectorReads()
currentParts = new ConsecutivePartList(startingPos);
allParts.add(currentParts);
}
currentParts.addChunk(new ChunkDescriptor(columnDescriptor, mc, startingPos, mc.getTotalSize()));
}
}
// actually read all the chunks
ChunkListBuilder builder = new ChunkListBuilder(block.getRowCount());
readAllPartsVectoredOrNormal(allParts, builder);
rowGroup.setReleaser(builder.releaser);
for (Chunk chunk : builder.build()) {
readChunkPages(chunk, block, rowGroup);
}
return rowGroup;
}
```
maybe a possible implementation could be to add fictive "ConsecutivePartList" that are to be ignored while receiving the data, but that would avoid having some wholes in the ranges to read.
### Component(s)
_No response_
Guida per i contributori
Nessuna guida per i contributori indicizzata per questo repository
Direzione di ricerca
Inizia da org.apache.parquet.hadoop.ParquetFileReader#internalReadRowGroup e segui come viene costruito ConsecutivePartList prima di readAllPartsVectoredOrNormal. Usa Hadoop FileSystem#minSeekForVectorReads come soglia per valutare i piccoli intervalli, quindi verifica che i chunk di colonna selezionati continuino a essere caricati mentre i piccoli intervalli vengono letti all'interno degli intervalli circostanti invece di causare seek separati.
Scritto dal modello di indicizzazione a partire dal testo della issue.
Valutazione
- Stack tecnologico
- hadoop, java
- Ambito
- data-engineering
- Tipo di issue
- Funzionalità
- Difficoltà
- 4/5
- Tempo stimato
- 3-5 giorni
- Stato di attività
- Ferma
- Chiarezza
- Abbastanza chiara
- Idoneità per principianti
- 45/100