apache / apache/parquet-java

Off heap memory leaks with large binary fields using Snappy

Abierto
#2,114 0 comentarios 0 reacciones 0 asignados Ver en GitHub
Component: Java Component: Parquet Priority: Major Type: bug
Lenguaje dominante
Java
Estrellas
3.1k
Forks
1.6k
Merge medio
3 d 12 h
PR fusionados (30 d)
33

Descripción

When I write a large pages (~100MB) that contains large binary fields (~1MB), the java application uses an unexpected amount of off-heap memory (1.2GB)

This problem was identified when using the `AvroParquetWriter` but its source lies in the parquet-hadoop submodule.

Diving a little bit deeper shows the following:
- writing fields into the ParquetWriter creates a SequenceBytesIn which is actually just a list of `BytesInput` for each field. When calling `bytes.writeAllTo(cos)` in the `CodecFactory`, it actually writes one `ByteInput` (which contains a single field) at a time.
- the `SnappyCompressor` receives the data in `setInput` one large field at a time. This calls `ByteBuffer.allocateDirect` each time with a growing size. But as the memory is actually allocated off-heap, this does not trigger the garbage collector which only sees small objects on the heap. The actual memory associated with the object is the size of all the fields added to the page until then, so off-heap the memory is growing quadratically.

I did not attach a pull request to this issue because I see multiple mitigation to the issue but I'm not really delighted by any of them:
- merge all the fields into one byte array before pushing them down to the `SnappyCompressor`. For instance we could replace the previous statement in the `CodecFactory` with `BytesInput.from(bytes.toByteArray()).writeAllTo(cos)`. But this generates an extra on-heap allocation the size of the whole page.
- force the `DirectBuffer` to be cleaned up with something like `((DirectBuffer)inputBuffer).cleaner().clean()` after having copied it to the new bigger buffer. The issue here would be that `DirectBuffer` is part of the internal API and is likely to be moved. Using reflexion could make the solution more resilient but is even "hackier" IMHO.

**Reporter**: [Remi Dettai](https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ViewProfile.jspa?name=remi.dettai)

**Note**: *This issue was originally created as [PARQUET-1188](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PARQUET-1188). Please see the [migration documentation](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PARQUET-2502) for further details.*

Guía de contribución

No hay ninguna guía de contribución indexada para este repositorio

Línea de trabajo

Comienza en el submódulo parquet-hadoop, siguiendo ParquetWriter y SequenceBytesIn hasta CodecFactory y SnappyCompressor. Reproduce el problema con páginas de aproximadamente 100MB que contengan campos binarios de 1MB y, a continuación, evalúa las vías de mitigación propuestas. Se considera terminado cuando las escrituras grandes ya no provocan un crecimiento cuadrático de la memoria off-heap y se conserva el comportamiento del writer.

Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.

Evaluación

Stack tecnológico
java
Área
performance
Tipo de issue
Error
Dificultad
4/5
Tiempo estimado
3-5 días
Estado de actividad
Estancado
Claridad
Necesita aclaración
Aptitud para principiantes
35/100

Recibe los nuevos issues en tu correo

Un resumen breve de issues de GitHub para principiantes.