Refactor the Statistics classes to match the specialized pattern used throughout parquet

Because Parquet tries very hard to avoid autoboxing, most of the core classes are specialized for each primitive by having a method for each type, eg:

```Java
void writeInt(int x);
void writeLong(long x);
void writeDouble(double x);
```

and so on.

However, the statistics classes take the other approach of having an InstStatistics class, a LongStatistics class, a DoubleStatistics class and so on. I think it's worth going for consistency and picking a pattern and sticking to it. Seems like the first pattern I mentioned is currently the more common one.

We may want to take this one step further and define an interface that these all conform to, eg:
```Java
public interface ParquetTypeVisitor {
void visitInt(int x);
void visitLong(long x);
void visitDouble(double x);
}
```

**Reporter**: [Alex Levenson](https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ViewProfile.jspa?name=alexlevenson) / @isnotinvain

_{**Note**: *This issue was originally created as [PARQUET-32](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PARQUET-32). Please see the [migration documentation](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PARQUET-2502) for further details.*}

Commencez par localiser les classes Statistics et les méthodes existantes spécialisées pour les types primitifs, telles que writeInt, writeLong et writeDouble. Comparez les conceptions actuelles de InstStatistics, LongStatistics et DoubleStatistics avec les modèles spécialisés environnants. Le travail est considéré comme terminé lorsque l’implémentation de Statistics suit un modèle cohérent et que l’interface ParquetTypeVisitor proposée est résolue dans le cadre de la conception.

Rédigé par le modèle d'indexation à partir du texte de l'issue.