Choose a strategy for semantic versioning of the java artifacts
- Dominant language
- Java
- Stars
- 3.1k
- Forks
- 1.6k
- Avg merge
- 3d 12h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 33
Description
We need to decide which java packages are "internal" and we are free to refactor without going up a major revision, and which are part of our public API and require strict semantic versioning. We need to then reflect this in the maven enforcer that detects these changes.
**Reporter**: [Alex Levenson](https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ViewProfile.jspa?name=alexlevenson) / @isnotinvain
**Note**: *This issue was originally created as [PARQUET-31](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PARQUET-31). Please see the [migration documentation](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PARQUET-2502) for further details.*
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
Research direction
Start by reviewing the Java package structure, the Maven enforcer configuration, and the migration documentation linked from the issue for PARQUET-31 context. Done means the public and internal package boundaries are agreed and the enforcer reflects the chosen semantic-versioning rules.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- java
- Domain
- build-system, release
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100