Logical AND Error causing - 305 INTERNAL_SEVER_ERROR

### Search before asking

- [x] I searched in the [issues](https://github.com/apache/iotdb/issues) and found nothing similar.

### Version

version 2.0.5 (Build: 0917050)

### Describe the bug and provide the minimal reproduce step

DELETE DATABASE root.db1;
CREATE DATABASE root.db1;

CREATE TIMESERIES root.db1.t2.c0 INT64;
CREATE TIMESERIES root.db1.t2.c1 INT64;
CREATE TIMESERIES root.db1.t2.c2 INT32;

INSERT INTO root.db1.t2(timestamp, c0, c1, c2) VALUES (1641024000000, 123, 1, 456);

#query 1
SELECT c2 AS ref0, c0 AS ref1 FROM root.db1.t2 WHERE c1 = 1 OR 1=0;

#query 2
SELECT c2 AS ref0, c0 AS ref1 FROM root.db1.t2 WHERE c1 = 1 OR 1!=0;

#query 3
SELECT c2 AS ref0, c0 AS ref1 FROM root.db1.t2 WHERE c1 = 1 AND 1=1;

### What did you expect to see?

query 1 : return 1 result

query2 : return 1 result

query3 : return 1 result

### What did you see instead?

query 1 : return 1 result

query2 : return 1 result

query3 : 305 INTERNAL_SERVER_ERROR

### Anything else?

dear IoTDB team, I found out adding a logically neutral constant to a WHERE clause using AND 1 = 1 causes INTERNAL_SERVER_ERROR (305), while the equivalent OR 1=1 does not.
This looks like the crash is tied to neutral conjuncts in AND

### Are you willing to submit a PR?

- [ ] I'm willing to submit a PR!

Comienza ejecutando las tres reproducciones SQL contra IoTDB 2.0.5 y compara los casos AND y OR. Traza cómo la expresión WHERE gestiona las comparaciones constantes y, después, añade cobertura de regresión para query 3; se considera terminado cuando las tres consultas devuelven un resultado sin un error 305.

Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.