[Protocol] Union support for row format
Open
enhancement
protocol
- Dominant language
- Java
- Stars
- 4.5k
- Forks
- 443
- Avg merge
- 6h 6m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 76
Description
## Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
A clear and concise description of what the problem is. Ex. I'm always frustrated when [...]
## Describe the solution you'd like
A clear and concise description of what you want to happen.
## Additional context
#314
Contributor guide
Research direction
The issue names no source file, test, or entry point and only links to issue #314. Start by reading #314 and tracing the protocol row-format design to determine the intended union behavior. Done would require a documented, tested union representation, but the acceptance criteria are not specified here.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- java
- Domain
- backend-api-design
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 20/100