apache / apache/datafusion-sqlparser-rs
Optional GROUP BY statement
- Vorherrschende Sprache
- Rust
- Sterne
- 3.5k
- Forks
- 772
- Ø Merge
- 4 T. 9 Std.
- Gemergte PRs (30 T.)
- 17
Beschreibung
Working on my custom sql validation, I needed somehow to check, does user provide group_by/limit+offset/sort_by clauses.
I got smth like this and found `.group_by` field as non-optional. Is it right?
```rust
let wrong_query = "SELECT * FROM example_table GROUP BY example_field";
//Parser returns success(!) below
if let Statement::Query(q) = Parser::parse_sql(&GenericDialect {}, &query)?.first().unwrap() {
if q.limit_clause.is_none() {...}
if q.order_by.is_none() {...}
let select_query = query.body.as_select().unwrap();
//And I expected smth like this:
if select_query.group_by.is_none() {...}
}
```
Maybe I'm doing smth wrong and there is a proper and faster way for that?
Also I noticed a `parse_optional_group_by` fn but I didn't get how to use it., there is no info nor examples in docs about it. Looks like it's inner fn?
Beitragsleitfaden
Für dieses Repository ist kein Beitragsleitfaden indexiert
Rechercherichtung
Start by reading the Select.group_by field returned through Parser::parse_sql and the parse_optional_group_by function mentioned in the issue. Determine how the parser represents an absent GROUP BY clause and whether the public API or its documentation needs to expose that distinction; done means the intended behavior is documented or covered by an appropriate parser test.
Vom Indexierungsmodell aus dem Issue-Text verfasst.
Bewertung
- Tech-Stack
- rust, sql
- Bereich
- compilers
- Issue-Typ
- Feature
- Schwierigkeit
- 3/5
- Geschätzter Aufwand
- 1-2 Tage
- Aktivitätsstatus
- Veraltet
- Klarheit
- Muss geklärt werden
- Anfängerfreundlichkeit
- 35/100