Add CPU Architecture attribute to Compute Offerings to prevent architecture mismatch with Templates/ISOs
- Linguagem predominante
- Java
- Estrelas
- 3.1k
- Forks
- 1.4k
- Merge médio
- 6d 19h
- PRs com merge (30d)
- 32
Descrição
### The required feature described as a wish
As an Admin/Operator running a multi-arch zone (x86_64 and aarch64 hosts separated via host tags), I would like Compute Offerings to support a CPU architecture attribute, so the offering list can be filtered to match the architecture of the selected Template/ISO during deployment.
## Problem
Architecture separation currently relies entirely on host tags applied to Compute Offerings. The Template/ISO architecture selector has no relationship to Compute Offering selection — picking an aarch64 template does not filter out x86_64-tagged offerings, or vice versa. Nothing in the UI or API prevents deploying an aarch64 template on an offering tagged for x86_64 hosts, or the reverse. This surfaces as a late-stage deployment failure rather than being caught at selection time.
Note: `registerTemplate` already accepts an `arch` parameter (`x86_64` / `aarch64`), but Compute Offerings have no equivalent, so there's no architecture metadata to match against at deploy time.
## Proposed solution
- Add an optional CPU architecture field to Compute Offering create/update, consistent with the existing `arch` values used elsewhere (`x86_64` / `aarch64`).
- If unset, offering behaves as it does today — always shown, no filtering.
- If set, offering should only be selectable/listed when the chosen Template/ISO architecture matches.
- Enforce at the API level (`deployVirtualMachine`), not just the UI wizard, so direct API/Terraform/CloudMonkey usage gets the same protection.
- `listComputeOfferings` should expose the field for external tooling.
- This complements host tags (which still control placement) — the new field controls offering visibility/selectability relative to template architecture.
Guia de contribuição
Direção de pesquisa
Comece pelas APIs create/update e listComputeOfferings de Compute Offering e, em seguida, rastreie deployVirtualMachine e o parâmetro arch existente de registerTemplate. Defina como os valores x86_64 e aarch64 correspondem, incluindo o caso em que o valor não está definido, e verifique se os caminhos de API, UI, Terraform e CloudMonkey impõem ou expõem o mesmo comportamento.
Escrita pelo modelo de indexação a partir do texto da issue.
Avaliação
- Stack de tecnologia
- java
- Domínio
- api, cloud, infrastructure
- Tipo de issue
- Funcionalidade
- Dificuldade
- 4/5
- Tempo estimado
- 3-5 dias
- Status de atividade
- Pouca atividade
- Clareza
- Razoavelmente clara
- Facilidade para iniciantes
- 48/100