apache / apache/cloudstack

Allow additional allowed IPs for VMs in Security Group networks

未关闭
#13,256 1 条评论 0 个 reaction 已指派 0 人 在 GitHub 查看
component:advanced-networking component:networking component:security-group type:new-feature
主要语言
Java
星标
3.1k
派生
1.4k
平均合并
6 天 19 小时
30 天内合并 PR
32

描述

### The required feature described as a wish

Hi,

I’m currently experimenting with Anycast for Kubernetes clusters.

For this setup, I have two BGP router VMs that talk to multiple tenant worker nodes. The worker nodes should be able to announce external IPs for Kubernetes LoadBalancer services.

The goal is to have multiple tenants on a shared L2 network and use Security Groups for isolation.

The issue is that CloudStack does not know about these external IPs in my scenario, so traffic gets blocked on the hypervisor iptables layer. As far as I understand it, only IPs that CloudStack knows about are allowed as destination IPs for a specific VM.

Even if I create a separate network containing those external IPs, I cannot assign the same IP to multiple VMs. Because of that, real Anycast is not possible.

What would be useful is a way to allow additional destination IPs for a VM or Security Group without requiring CloudStack to assign those IPs directly to a single VM. This would allow external systems, like Kubernetes with BGP-based LoadBalancer announcements, to handle the IP ownership dynamically while CloudStack still provides L2 isolation and anti-spoofing.

贡献指南

打开贡献指南

调研方向

首先审查 issue 中描述的 Security Group 行为和 hypervisor iptables 过滤,重点关注当前如何为 VM 允许目标 IP。定义如何在保留 L2 隔离和 anti-spoofing 的同时,为 VM 或 Security Group 允许其他目标 IP,然后针对 Kubernetes BGP Anycast 场景验证该设计。

由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。

评估

技术栈
kubernetes
领域
cloud, networking, security
Issue 类型
功能
难度
5/5
预计耗时
一周以上
活跃度
冷清
描述清晰度
基本清楚
新手友好度
42/100

把新 issue 发到你的邮箱

精选适合新手参与的 GitHub issue 摘要。