Configdrive/storage repository issue on XCP-ng

### problem

Issue No1:
In case of failed deployments there are unused storage repositories left behind.

`example:
**xe vdi-list uuid=f16e0133-2074-49af-a393-1bb9fa007fb5**
uuid ( RO) : f16e0133-2074-49af-a393-1bb9fa007fb5
name-label ( RW): i-2-24-VM.iso
name-description ( RW):
sr-uuid ( RO): **608c63b9-9c12-bf6a-8d28-f2bc7d01d343**
virtual-size ( RO): 409600
sharable ( RO): false
read-only ( RO): true

**xe sr-list name-label=i-2-24-VM-CONFIGDRIVE-ISO**
uuid ( RO) : 12b1e17a-fb1c-d99f-451c-baf035b822f2
name-label ( RW): i-2-24-VM-CONFIGDRIVE-ISO
name-description ( RW): 10.1.32.4:/acs/secondary/ref-trl-6095-x-Mu24/ref-trl-6095-x-Mu24-sec2/configdrive
host ( RO):
type ( RO): iso
content-type ( RO): iso

uuid ( RO) : **608c63b9-9c12-bf6a-8d28-f2bc7d01d343**
name-label ( RW): i-2-24-VM-CONFIGDRIVE-ISO
name-description ( RW): 10.1.32.4:/acs/secondary/ref-trl-6095-x-Mu24/ref-trl-6095-x-Mu24-sec2/configdrive
host ( RO):
type ( RO): iso
content-type ( RO): iso

uuid ( RO) : 222f3918-75e1-99f9-f7f2-e63d714c130f
name-label ( RW): i-2-24-VM-CONFIGDRIVE-ISO
name-description ( RW): 10.1.32.4:/acs/secondary/ref-trl-6095-x-Mu24/ref-trl-6095-x-Mu24-sec2/configdrive
host ( RO):
type ( RO): iso
content-type ( RO): iso`

As you see above just one storage repository is being used for the ISO file.
This has no functional impact but leaves something unused behind.

Issue No 2:
Within a storage repository which name is specified to one particular VM you can see all the iso files from all the other VMs since they are located in the same secondary storage. Why not have one general storage repository like "VM-CONFIGDRIVE-ISO" to avoid both issues?

### versions

ACS: 4.20.1
XCP-ng: 8.2

### The steps to reproduce the bug

1. Build a couple of VMs where you have limited resources available on the hypervisors.
2.

3. The hypervisor still has been selected for deployments but failed from hypervisor side
4. Several attempts have happened
```
cat /var/log/cloudstack/management/management-server.log | grep job-117 | grep 'VM start attempt'
2025-10-28 14:22:19,361 DEBUG [c.c.v.ClusteredVirtualMachineManagerImpl] (Work-Job-Executor-42:[ctx-a1bf013f, job-117/job-118, ctx-520420a9]) (logid:67fb25c7) VM start attempt #1
2025-10-28 14:22:24,301 DEBUG [c.c.v.ClusteredVirtualMachineManagerImpl] (Work-Job-Executor-42:[ctx-a1bf013f, job-117/job-118, ctx-520420a9]) (logid:67fb25c7) VM start attempt #2
2025-10-28 14:22:25,371 DEBUG [c.c.v.ClusteredVirtualMachineManagerImpl] (Work-Job-Executor-43:[ctx-34843ad3, job-117/job-119, ctx-605dae51]) (logid:67fb25c7) VM start attempt #1
2025-10-28 14:22:28,159 DEBUG [c.c.v.ClusteredVirtualMachineManagerImpl] (Work-Job-Executor-43:[ctx-34843ad3, job-117/job-119, ctx-605dae51]) (logid:67fb25c7) VM start attempt #2
```
5. For each attempt a storage repository has been created. Every time an ISO file as well. On failed attempt the ISO file has been removed but the storage repository not.
6. Once the VM finally got deployed you'll end up with multiple storage repositories, used and unused once with the same name.

### What to do about it?

Option 1: Besides removing the ISO file do also remove the storage repository on failed deployments.
Option 2: Use one general storage repository for all ISO files.

首先使用 management-server.log 中的 VM 启动尝试记录以及 xe sr-list/xe vdi-list 的输出，复现针对 ACS 4.20.1 和 XCP-ng 8.2 所描述的部署重试失败。比较每次失败尝试后的清理情况，并确定实现应删除未使用的存储库，还是为 config-drive ISO 共享一个存储库。完成的标准是：失败的尝试不会留下未使用的存储库，并且成功的部署仍保留对其 ISO 的访问权限。

由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。