[JAVA] FlightSQL JDBC Driver PreparedStatement#setTimestamp() ignores connection timeStampPrecision
- Langage dominant
- Java
- Étoiles
- 94
- Forks
- 152
- Merge moyen
- 3 j 16 h
- PR mergées (30 j)
- 11
Description
The FlightSQL JDBC driver always treats timestamps as milliseconds when sending them to the server, ignoring the connection setting timeStampPrecision (for example microseconds). As a result, when the connection precision is set to microseconds the driver truncates/offsets the timestamp and the value stored on the server is incorrect.
Expected behavior When the JDBC connection option timeStampPrecision is set (e.g. microseconds, milliseconds, nanoseconds), PreparedStatement#setTimestamp (and setTimestamp with timestamptz) should send timestamps with the configured precision so the server receives the correct epoch value.
Actual behavior The driver converts java.sql.Timestamp values to an epoch value assuming milliseconds. If the connection is configured for microseconds (or other precision) the conversion is incorrect and inserted timestamps are wrong.
```
String jdbcUrlFlight = "jdbc:arrow-flight-sql://localhost:9994?useEncryption=0";
try (Connection conn = DriverManager.getConnection(jdbcUrlFlight);
PreparedStatement stmt = conn.prepareStatement("INSERT INTO ... VALUES (?, ?, ?, ?, ?)")) {
for (RowData row : generatedData) {
stmt.setDate(1, row.c_date());
stmt.setTime(2, row.c_time());
stmt.setTime(3, row.c_timetz());
stmt.setTimestamp(4, row.c_timestamp()); // incorrect conversion happens here
stmt.setTimestamp(5, row.c_timestamptz()); // and here
stmt.addBatch();
}
stmt.executeBatch();
}
```
Example A — timestamp precision in microseconds (bug triggered)
- Value I want to insert:
- Timestamp object: "2024-11-03 12:45:09.869885001"
- nanos = 869885001
- fastTime = 1730634309000
- **DateTimeUtils#sqlTimestampToUnixTimestamp(Timestamp, TimeZone) returns: 1730637909869**:
- Interpreted as milliseconds, that is: **2024-11-03 12:45:09.869** (GMT)
- Final value inserted into server: **1970-01-21 00:43:57.909869**
- Incorrect because the connection used microsecond precision but driver treated the value as milliseconds.
Example B — timestamp precision in milliseconds (works)
- Value I want to insert:
- "**2023-11-29 09:47:32.659534860**"
- nanos = 659534860
- fastTime = 1701247652000
- Driver sends: 1701251252659 (interpreted as milliseconds)
- Server receives: **2023-11-29 09:47:32.659** — correct when precision is milliseconds.
Environment
- flight-sql-jdbc-driver-18.3.0.jar
- Java: 17
- Server FlightSQL implementation/version: 18.2
- OS: Windows
Relevant code & suspected area
DateTimeUtils#sqlTimestampToUnixTimestamp(Timestamp, TimeZone) appears to be converting timestamps assuming millisecond precision.
```
public static long sqlTimestampToUnixTimestamp(Timestamp timestamp, TimeZone timeZone) {
long time = timestamp.getTime();
LocalDateTime dateTime = timestamp.toLocalDateTime();
long unixTimestamp = dateTime.toEpochSecond(ZoneOffset.UTC) * 1000L + (long)dateTime.get(ChronoField.MILLI_OF_SECOND);
if (timeZone != null) {
unixTimestamp += (long)timeZone.getOffset(time);
}
unixTimestamp -= (long)DEFAULT_ZONE.getOffset(time);
return unixTimestamp;
}
```
The driver should respect the connection timeStampPrecision parameter, and correctlyreturn the exact epoch value (as a long) at the configured timestamp precision.
Guide de contribution
Ouvrir le guide de contribution
Piste de recherche
Start by tracing PreparedStatement#setTimestamp and setTimestamp for timestamptz into DateTimeUtils#sqlTimestampToUnixTimestamp(Timestamp, TimeZone), then inspect how the connection timeStampPrecision option is exposed to that path. Reproduce the microsecond and millisecond examples from the issue and add or update focused coverage if the relevant test location is identified. Done means the server receives the correct epoch value for each configured precision.
Rédigé par le modèle d'indexation à partir du texte de l'issue.
Évaluation
- Stack technique
- java
- Domaine
- databases
- Type d'issue
- Bug
- Difficulté
- 3/5
- Temps estimé
- 1-2 jours
- Activité
- À l'abandon
- Clarté
- Clairement spécifiée
- Accessibilité débutants
- 48/100