[Java] DictionaryProvider leaks memory while adding dictionaries with duplicate encoding

DictionaryProvider leaks memory while adding dictionaries with duplicate encoding. Is this expected? Should the provider release the memory of the existing dictionary vector if it accepts another one with same encoding id ?

Sample code:
```java

"dictionaryProvider" should " not leak memory while adding dictionaries with duplicate encoding" in {

val allocator: RootAllocator = new RootAllocator()

val vector: ListVector = ListVector.empty("vector", allocator)
val dictionaryVector1: ListVector = ListVector.empty("dict1", allocator)
val dictionaryVector2: ListVector = ListVector.empty("dict2", allocator)

val writer1: UnionListWriter = vector.getWriter
writer1.allocate
writer1.setValueCount(1)

val dictWriter1: UnionListWriter = dictionaryVector1.getWriter
dictWriter1.allocate
dictWriter1.setValueCount(1)

val dictWriter2: UnionListWriter = dictionaryVector2.getWriter
dictWriter2.allocate
dictWriter2.setValueCount(1)

val dictionary1: Dictionary = new Dictionary(dictionaryVector1, new DictionaryEncoding(1L, false, None.orNull))
val dictionary2: Dictionary = new Dictionary(dictionaryVector2, new DictionaryEncoding(1L, false, None.orNull))

val provider = new DictionaryProvider.MapDictionaryProvider
provider.put(dictionary1)
provider.put(dictionary2)

vector.clear()
provider.getDictionaryIds.asScala.map(id => provider.lookup(id).getVector.clear())

allocator.getAllocatedMemory shouldBe 0
}
```

**Reporter**: [Vimal Varghese](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-16920)

_{**Note**: *This issue was originally created as [ARROW-16920](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-16920). Please see the [migration documentation](https://github.com/apache/arrow/issues/14542) for further details.*}

Partite da DictionaryProvider.MapDictionaryProvider ed eseguite la riproduzione fornita, che aggiunge due dizionari con l'encoding ID 1, svuota il vettore e verifica la memoria dell'allocator. Tracciate cosa accade al primo dizionario quando viene inserito il secondo; il lavoro è concluso quando il caso di encoding duplicato rilascia tutta la memoria allocata e il controllo finale delle allocazioni raggiunge zero.

Scritto dal modello di indicizzazione a partire dal testo della issue.